2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ten-year survival rate for cantilevered fixed partial dentures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To can establish the indications of metal-ceramic fixed prostheses in a rigorous and scientific way we need first to establish what is the prognosis of such treatments, for that purpose we are going to be based on the meta-amnalisis studies, systematic reviews and long prospective or retrospective studies. We have plentiful evidence on the prognosis of this treatment based on systematic reviews that include most of the work over the last five years preceding the date of publication [2,3,4,5,6] and even two meta-analyzes examining all studies published since 1960 and 70 respectively including more of four thousand fixed bridges analyzed. [7,8] Based on these papers, we can draw the following conclusions, the overall survival of this type of treatment can be from nearly 94% at five years to 74% fifteen years after, the main causes of failure were caries, abutment fracture and periodontitis, but it is important to say that in addition to the high survival data, these studies indicate that less than 5% of the abutments were lost ten years after the cementation.…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To can establish the indications of metal-ceramic fixed prostheses in a rigorous and scientific way we need first to establish what is the prognosis of such treatments, for that purpose we are going to be based on the meta-amnalisis studies, systematic reviews and long prospective or retrospective studies. We have plentiful evidence on the prognosis of this treatment based on systematic reviews that include most of the work over the last five years preceding the date of publication [2,3,4,5,6] and even two meta-analyzes examining all studies published since 1960 and 70 respectively including more of four thousand fixed bridges analyzed. [7,8] Based on these papers, we can draw the following conclusions, the overall survival of this type of treatment can be from nearly 94% at five years to 74% fifteen years after, the main causes of failure were caries, abutment fracture and periodontitis, but it is important to say that in addition to the high survival data, these studies indicate that less than 5% of the abutments were lost ten years after the cementation.…”
Section: Indicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,26,27 In this study, in order to benefit from adhesion to enamel in a larger surface area, two retainers were used. Annual failure rate of 1.73% with functional survival rates ranging between 93.5 and 100% in this study, were slightly higher than those reported in the systematic review on FRC FDPs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%