A systematic review of goal-oriented requirements management frameworks for business process compliance

Ghanavati, Sepideh; Amyot, Daniel; Peyton, Liam

doi:10.1109/relaw.2011.6050270

Cited by 56 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The Daneva et al evaluation, looking at existing SLRs in RE [9], finds two reviews related to GORE [13,20]. The former is the previous work of some of the authors, while the latter, focusing on compliance, was omitted from our survey as it appeared in a workshop.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last two decades, much attention has been paid to the area of goal-oriented requirements engineering (GORE), where goals are used as a useful conceptualization to elicit, model, and analyze requirements, capturing alternatives and conflicts. Goal modeling has been adapted and applied to many sub-topics within requirements engineering (RE) and beyond, such as agent orientation, aspect orientation, business intelligence, model-driven development, and security. Despite extensive efforts in this field, the RE community lacks a recent, general systematic literature review of the area. In this work, we present a systematic mapping study, covering the 246 top-cited GORE-related conference and journal papers, according to Scopus. Our literature map addresses several research questions: we classify the types of papers (e.g., proposals, formalizations, meta-studies), look at the presence of evaluation, the topics covered (e.g., security, agents, scenarios), frameworks used, venues, citations, author networks, and overall publication numbers. For most questions, we evaluate trends over time. Our findings show a proliferation of papers with new ideas and few citations, with a small number of authors and papers dominating citations; however, there is a slight rise in papers which build upon past work (implementations, integrations, and extensions). We see a rise in papers concerning adaptation/variability/evolution and a slight rise in case studies. Overall, interest in GORE has increased. We use our analysis results to make recommendations concerning future GORE research and make our data publicly available.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…After the analysis and enumeration of the topics of each relevant legislation, it is necessary to identify the specific topics that potentially influence the company's product development [68]. In other words, the relevant topics are those in which the legislation could affect the definition of requirements on how a particular product should be developed or managed throughout its life cycle.…”

Section: Step 3-analysis Of the Relevant Legislation And Topicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is also necessary to clarify what is written in legal texts; in order to do that, it is possible to classify the topics according to the Hohfeld's taxonomy [66][67][68]70]. This taxonomy is based on eight elementary concepts: privilege, claim, power, immunity, "no-right", duty, liability, and disability [66,67,70].…”

Section: Step 6-classification Of Legislation and Definition Of The Omentioning

confidence: 99%

The Deployment of Product-Related Environmental Legislation into Product Requirements

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental legislation is increasingly changing its focus from manufacturing-oriented to product-oriented instruments. Compliance with product-related environmental legislation is achieved by the incorporation of environmental requirements into the early phases of the product development process (PDP). Nevertheless, the deployment of product-related environmental legislation into product requirements is still a challenge. This study followed an inductive approach to propose a guideline to support the identification, analysis and deployment of product requirements based on product-related environmental legislation. The guideline is composed of nine steps, clustered into three groups according to their main objective: (A) identification of environmental product-related legislation; (B) identification of legislative topics to be considered for the deployment of requirements; and (C) creation and validation of product requirements. The product requirements deployed are to be considered during the PDP. The guideline was evaluated in an expert consultation in a large manufacturing company, suggesting that it can be used to support the systematization and deployment of product-related environmental requirements.

show abstract

“…They stem from diverse sources ranging from voluntary norms or standards (e.g. ISO 38500, COBIT) to policies imposed by active legislation (Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 8th EU directive, Basel I-III) [1]. To ensure a compliant state of their business processes organizations implement and maintain a multitude of different measures collectively referred to as the internal control system (ICS).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, comprehensive surveys revealed that methods for annotating, and enhancing business process models with compliance/ audit modeling elements are one of the main open issues on the research agenda for business process compliance [10,11]. Not surprisingly, surveys among auditors show that common process modeling languages (PML) 1 are not widely used in current audit practice [4,12]. This indicates that common PMLs do not sufficiently meet auditors' requirements for annotating audit-relevant concepts in process models [6,11,12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modeling Concepts for Internal Controls in Business Processes – An Empirically Grounded Extension of BPMN

Schultz

Radloff

2014

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.With the increasing number and complexity of legal obligations, ensuring business process compliance presents a major challenge for today's organizations. In this regard, implementing a set of control means and regularly auditing their effectiveness are suitable measures to ensure a compliant design and enactment of a business process. However, common business process modeling languages (PML) do not provide appropriate concepts to comprehensively model such control means. Not surprisingly, common PMLs are not widely used in the audit domain. To address this gap, this paper presents an extension of a PML with modeling concepts for process-integrated control means. As it is based on previous empirical research with auditors, the extension especially considers their requirements. The results of a laboratory experiment with 78 participants demonstrate that the extension supports auditors to gain a more comprehensive understanding of internal controls in a process model compared to current audit practice.

show abstract

A systematic review of goal-oriented requirements management frameworks for business process compliance

Cited by 56 publications

References 22 publications

Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study

Goal-oriented requirements engineering: an extended systematic mapping study

The Deployment of Product-Related Environmental Legislation into Product Requirements

Modeling Concepts for Internal Controls in Business Processes – An Empirically Grounded Extension of BPMN

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About