2015
DOI: 10.2215/cjn.03080314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Glomerular Hyperfiltration Assessment and Definition in the Medical Literature

Abstract: Background and objectives Evaluation of glomerular hyperfiltration (GH) is difficult; the variable reported definitions impede comparisons between studies. A clear and universal definition of GH would help in comparing results of trials aimed at reducing GH. This study assessed how GH is measured and defined in the literature.Design, setting, participants, & measurements Three databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL) were systematically searched using the terms "hyperfiltration" or "glomerular hyperfiltration". All… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
138
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
138
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic review by Cachat et al [43] on the assessment of glomerular hyperfiltratrion shows that 55.6% of examined studies report an HF threshold of 135 mL/min, although definitions range between 90 and 175 mL/min; even if Helal et al [17] restrict the range from 120 to 175 mL/min, both studies clearly evidence that an unanimously accepted definition of HF does not exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic review by Cachat et al [43] on the assessment of glomerular hyperfiltratrion shows that 55.6% of examined studies report an HF threshold of 135 mL/min, although definitions range between 90 and 175 mL/min; even if Helal et al [17] restrict the range from 120 to 175 mL/min, both studies clearly evidence that an unanimously accepted definition of HF does not exist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, while hyperfiltering, untreated patients may be easily found in type I diabetes, where even reference control groups from previously published studies are reported [43], to select a control group of age-and sex-matched patients in FD is extremely difficult, since the diagnosis of the disease is often delayed and its clinical expression (including HF) is strongly conditioned by the type of mutation, the amount of residual enzymatic activity, and the different levels of Gb3. The actual implementation of early diagnosis of FD DOI: 10.1159/000493469 may allow the recruitment of new patients and provide a control group for HF study in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eGFR cut-off was arbitrarily selected based on National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) that states an eGFR o 90 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 is abnormal [16]. It is unknown what defines normal kidney function in the obese patient [17,19,20]. To achieve an 80% probability of detecting a significant change in renal function, power calculations indicated that 10 and 21 patients were required in the eGFR o 90 and 4 90 mL/ min per 1.73 m 2 subgroups, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min per 1.73 m 2 ) using the CKD-EPI formula [9] ¼ [16,17].…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings suggest that larger glomeruli have undergone compensatory hypertrophic growth that tends to normalize the total glomerular volume in a kidney (15). Glomerular hypertrophy also occurs with hypertension and obesity, suggesting that increased metabolic and excretory demands can contribute to compensatory glomerular growth (16)(17)(18). Although the effect of increased glomerular volume on glomerular function is unclear (18-21), Denic et al recently found that single-nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR; measured GFR divided by the number of nephrons) in healthy adult kidney donors was fairly constant with regard to age, sex, and height (if < 190 cm) (22).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%