A Systematic Review of Asthma Phenotypes Derived by Data-Driven Methods

Abstract

Classification of asthma phenotypes has a potentially relevant impact on the clinical management of the disease. Methods for statistical classification without a priori assumptions (data-driven approaches) may contribute to developing a better comprehension of trait heterogeneity in disease phenotyping. This study aimed to summarize and characterize asthma phenotypes derived by data-driven methods. We performed a systematic review using three scientific databases, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. We included studies reporting adult asthma phenotypes derived by data-driven methods using easily accessible variables in clinical practice. Two independent reviewers assessed studies. The methodological quality of included primary studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. We retrieved 7446 results and included 68 studies of which 65% (n = 44) used data from specialized centers and 53% (n = 36) evaluated the consistency of phenotypes. The most frequent data-driven method was hierarchical cluster analysis (n = 19). Three major asthma-related domains of easily measurable clinical variables used for phenotyping were identified: personal (n = 49), functional (n = 48) and clinical (n = 47). The identified asthma phenotypes varied according to the sample’s characteristics, variables included in the model, and data availability. Overall, the most frequent phenotypes were related to atopy, gender, and severe disease. This review shows a large variability of asthma phenotypes derived from data-driven methods. Further research should include more population-based samples and assess longitudinal consistency of data-driven phenotypes.

Typologies of Canadian young adults who drive after cannabis use: A two‐step cluster analysis

“…Second, the optimal subgroup model was chosen with a probabilistic approach, similar to latent class analysis, using Schwarz's Bayesian Criterion (BIC) as the clustering criterion (Gelbard et al., 2007; Kent et al., 2014). Latent class analysis is a model‐based approach that uses parametric probability distribution and assumes the existence of an unobserved latent outcome variable that underlies differences among groups, while two‐step cluster analysis also relies on an approach of distance/similarities between observations (Benassi et al., 2020; Cunha et al., 2021). Both analyses can produce convergent similar clustering solutions on the same dataset, but two‐step cluster analysis tended to be easier to use and interpret than latent class analysis (Benassi et al., 2020; Kent et al., 2014).…”

As várias faces da rinite

“…Os fenótipos podem ser definidos considerando diversos critérios clínicos (por exemplo, idade de início, gravidade, sazonalidade, frequência dos sintomas ou os seus desencadeantes), estando descritos múltiplos sistemas de classificação (exemplificados no Quadro 1) com maior ou menor relevância do ponto de vista clínico. A maioria destas classificações fenotípicas foi de-Ana Margarida Pereira 1,2,3,4 senvolvida unicamente com base em hipóteses a priori, a partir do conhecimento teórico disponível sobre a rinite, sendo ainda relativamente escassos os estudos que descrevem fenótipos obtidos a partir de técnicas estatísticas de classificação em clusters 10,11 , ao contrário do que já acontece na asma 12 . Estes fenótipos "clássicos", que não são estabelecidos diretamente a partir dos dados de doentes com rinite, são dinâmicos e podem sobrepor -se, dificultando definições claras 3 .…”