2019
DOI: 10.1108/jeas-10-2018-0123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of AACSB International accreditation quality and value research

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conduct a systematic review of the research on the quality and value of AACSB International accreditation. Design/methodology/approach Data were abstracted from published journal articles between 2003 and 2017 in which the words “AACSB” and “quality” or “value” (or both quality and value) were used in the title or the article text. Findings In total, 91 studies were identified that have been published on the value and/or quality of AACSB accreditation. These studies … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is for this reason that the selection of journal articles published between 2018 and 2022 is justified to show what has been measured, and who has been involved in AoL processes over these five years. Importantly, this research builds on the work of MacKenzie et al (2020) whose systematic literature review was undertaken between 2003 and 2017 and therefore provided a foundation to further extend the body of work to include more recent developments in AoL.…”
Section: Measuring Assurance Of Learning Between 2018 and 2022mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is for this reason that the selection of journal articles published between 2018 and 2022 is justified to show what has been measured, and who has been involved in AoL processes over these five years. Importantly, this research builds on the work of MacKenzie et al (2020) whose systematic literature review was undertaken between 2003 and 2017 and therefore provided a foundation to further extend the body of work to include more recent developments in AoL.…”
Section: Measuring Assurance Of Learning Between 2018 and 2022mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See, Leroi-Werelds (2019, p. 1758): ‘one of the most fundamental and most often cited definitions of customer value is the one proposed by Zeithaml (1988, p. 14)’. MacKenzie et al (2019, p. 3) assert that ‘Zeithaml’s (1988) definition has been widely accepted’, Sánchez-Fernández and Gallarza (2020, p. 62) emphasized that ‘this conceptualization […] has been the basis for a substantial majority of definitions’, and Zeithaml et al (2020, p. 20) indicate that recent studies continue to use Zeithaml’s unidimensional conceptualization.…”
Section: Lack Of Consistency In Value Conceptualization and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OBE represents a paradigm shift in educational practice, shifting learning that focuses on what students know and can do. OBE begins with curriculum design and development, implementation of learning and assessment processes, and improving the quality of educational methods, products, and services [14]. Although the learning outcomes approach is functional, educational organizations need to consider learning outcomes from different perceptions than those of multi-stakeholders [11].…”
Section: Accreditation and Obementioning
confidence: 99%