2020
DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2020.080202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review: How are Mental Model of Chemistry Concepts?

Abstract: This descriptive content analysis study was carried out to review students and pre-service teachers ' mental model of chemistry concepts. This study was motivated by difficulties experienced by students and teachers in the process of learning chemistry. This study put on criteria with specific keyword about a mental model in chemistry concepts and a period of 2009 till 2019 which relevant databases yielded a total of 66 articles. This study covers 41 qualitative studies, 18 quantitative studies, and this remai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three levels of chemistry representations are connected and reflected in students' mental models [14], [15]. One of the urgencies of exploring mental models is to master chemical concepts, and this is intended to improve the chemistry learning process [16], [17]. A teacher should know how students develop their mental model to ensure they do not do it mistakenly because a mental model is essential to constructing a theory and chemistry practices [18], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three levels of chemistry representations are connected and reflected in students' mental models [14], [15]. One of the urgencies of exploring mental models is to master chemical concepts, and this is intended to improve the chemistry learning process [16], [17]. A teacher should know how students develop their mental model to ensure they do not do it mistakenly because a mental model is essential to constructing a theory and chemistry practices [18], [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%