2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety Following Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate and Transurethral Resection of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
26
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by the fact that HoLEP yielded more prostate tissue removed as shown in the current study (marginally significant). We also confirmed that HoLEP had better perioperative parameters, including shorter operation time, less bleeding, and shorter catheterisation and hospitalisation time (Jones et al., 2016; Yin et al., 2013; Zhong et al., 2019). On the other hand, to date there have been only two trials comparing HoLEP and OP in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be explained by the fact that HoLEP yielded more prostate tissue removed as shown in the current study (marginally significant). We also confirmed that HoLEP had better perioperative parameters, including shorter operation time, less bleeding, and shorter catheterisation and hospitalisation time (Jones et al., 2016; Yin et al., 2013; Zhong et al., 2019). On the other hand, to date there have been only two trials comparing HoLEP and OP in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The literature search of the current study identified nine RCTs comparing long‐term (>12 months) functional outcomes of HoLEP with those of TURP. We confirmed that as compared to TURP, HoLEP had greater improvement in IPSS, PVR and Qmax (Yin, Teng, Huang, Zhang, & Xu, 2013; Zhong, Feng, Peng, & Liang, 2019). This could be explained by the fact that HoLEP yielded more prostate tissue removed as shown in the current study (marginally significant).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Overall, the fear of stress urinary incontinence, bleeding and bladder injury were noted as not being a major hindrance to adoption of AEEP. Although they remain as a concern among some participants of the study, with the current technical advances and relevant experience, the outcomes are favourable (Zhong, Feng, Peng, & Liang, 2019). Learning curve is another important aspect in achieving good outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recurrence rate of BPH after AEEP was significantly decreased as a result of more thorough resection and more evident boundary between transitional zone and surgical capsule; however, post‐operative UI is still an inevitable problem after AEEP (Zhong, Feng, Peng, & Liang, ). According to the recommendations of the International Continence Society, involuntary urine leak was defined as urinary incontinence (UI) (Xu et al, ).…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%