2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
206
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(229 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
206
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Bhatia et al 37 reported the results of 10 clinical studies on the Latarjet procedure in their systematic review and showed postoperative recurrent instability rates ranging from 0% to 8%, with the duration of follow-up ranging from 6 months to 14.3 years. In a meta-analysis of 8 clinical studies comparing 416 shoulders treated with the Bankart repair versus 379 shoulders treated with the Latarjet procedure for instability, An et al 13 reported a significantly lower postoperative recurrent instability rate in the Latarjet cohort (11.6%) compared with the Bankart cohort (21.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bhatia et al 37 reported the results of 10 clinical studies on the Latarjet procedure in their systematic review and showed postoperative recurrent instability rates ranging from 0% to 8%, with the duration of follow-up ranging from 6 months to 14.3 years. In a meta-analysis of 8 clinical studies comparing 416 shoulders treated with the Bankart repair versus 379 shoulders treated with the Latarjet procedure for instability, An et al 13 reported a significantly lower postoperative recurrent instability rate in the Latarjet cohort (11.6%) compared with the Bankart cohort (21.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Arthroscopic stabilization procedures have been similarly associated with recurrent instability, with recurrence rates ranging from 10.8% to 21.1%. [10][11][12][13] As a result, it has become essential for physicians to recognize clinical factors that place patients at increased risk of failed nonoperative or arthroscopic treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,8 It addresses both soft tissue and bony lesions that affect the anterior glenohumeral joint by separating the subscapularis to create a window to the anterior glenohumeral joint and transposing the horizontal aspect of the coracoid process to the anteroinferior glenoid rim. 3,4,8 It should be noted that the Latarjet procedure has been referred to as the Latarjet-Patte, Bristow-Latarjet, and coracoid transfer, with the primary differences being the number of screws used and concurrent repair of the anterior capsule. 3,8 As surgeons studied and ultimately adopted the Latarjet procedure, the reported outcomes were positive and comparable with, if not better than, the Bankart repair.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4,8 It should be noted that the Latarjet procedure has been referred to as the Latarjet-Patte, Bristow-Latarjet, and coracoid transfer, with the primary differences being the number of screws used and concurrent repair of the anterior capsule. 3,8 As surgeons studied and ultimately adopted the Latarjet procedure, the reported outcomes were positive and comparable with, if not better than, the Bankart repair. The systematic review and meta-analysis by An et al 8 demonstrated that the Latarjet procedure produced better outcomes than the Bankart repair procedure.…”
Section: Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that soft tissue loss and stretching of the musculotendinous unit are involved with the biomechanical alteration in the glenohumeral joint balance, which are risk factors for recurring subluxation [62]. In our denced movement restriction in both surgical repairs, Latarjet and Bankart, the latter implying about 6˚ of significant postoperative restriction [56]. Regarding open surgery, one of the explanations for reduction or loss of external and internal rotation includes excessive capsule thickening, cut or shortening of subscapularis tendon, and especially, the development of fibrosis in the reconstructed capsulolabral complex [38].…”
Section: Repair Failurementioning
confidence: 49%