The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96273-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of obstetric and maternal outcomes after prior uterine artery embolization

Abstract: This study aimed to review the obstetric complications during subsequent pregnancies after uterine artery embolization (UAE) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) by exploring the relationship between prior UAE and obstetric complications through a meta-analysis. We conducted a systematic literature review through March 31, 2021, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in compliance with the PRISMA guidelines and determined the effect of prior UAE for PPH on the rate of placenta … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I) as previously described [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions tool (ROBINS-I) as previously described [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A risk of bias assessment was performed using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool, as previously performed [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous articles were screened by their titles, abstracts, and full texts, as previously described with modification [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. All abstracts were screened by Sa.M.…”
Section: Systematic Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%