2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-014-0718-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in India

Abstract: The purpose of the study was to provide the pooled estimate of the prevalence of subclinical mastitis among dairy cows in India and to examine the consistency of those estimates between published studies. We have conducted a systematic review of prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows for the period 1995-2014 using electronic and non-electronic databases. Meta-analysis of 28 studies was done under random effects model using Metaprop package in R software. The pooled estimate of prevalence of subclinic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of mastitis found in this study is lower than that in the studies of Janzekovic et al ( 2009 ) in Slovenia, Muhammad et al ( 2011 ) in Pakistan, and Siddiquee et al ( 2013 ) in Bangladesh, all of which used the Draminski ® test and reported prevalence values of 80%, 65.2% and 55.1% respectively. However, prevalence of mastitis in this study was higher than that reported in other studies that used the Draminski ® test: Hassan, Samarasinghe and Lopez-Benavides ( 2007 ) reported a prevalence rate of 39% in New Zealand, and Yogesh et al ( 2014 ) reported a prevalence of 46.4% in India.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The prevalence of mastitis found in this study is lower than that in the studies of Janzekovic et al ( 2009 ) in Slovenia, Muhammad et al ( 2011 ) in Pakistan, and Siddiquee et al ( 2013 ) in Bangladesh, all of which used the Draminski ® test and reported prevalence values of 80%, 65.2% and 55.1% respectively. However, prevalence of mastitis in this study was higher than that reported in other studies that used the Draminski ® test: Hassan, Samarasinghe and Lopez-Benavides ( 2007 ) reported a prevalence rate of 39% in New Zealand, and Yogesh et al ( 2014 ) reported a prevalence of 46.4% in India.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In the present study, prevalence of subclinical mastitis at cow level was 41% and was slightly less when compared to previous meta-analysis study on subclinical mastitis was 46.35% in cows (Bangar et al, 2015). However, the past study reported the prevalence of subclinical mastitis ranges from 15 to 75 % (Cynthia, 2005) and concurred with the present study.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of Subclinical and Clinical Mastitissupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The prevalence of mastitis in dairy animals was found to be variable from study to study due to the variations in the period and location of study, breed of animal, stage of lactation, number of samples tested, sampling strategies and management practices of the dairy farms. Previous literature has reported the metaanalysis of prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows for the period 1995-2014 (Bangar et al, 2015), however, the metaanalysis of prevalence of clinical mastitis and major mastitis pathogens were not reported so far. Among the bacteria isolated in bovine mastitis, Staphylococcus species occupies an important place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hiitiö et al, 2017) including reports from India (Sharma et al, 2012). Meta-analysis of subclinical mastitis in cows revealed prevalence of SCM in India to the tune of 46.35% on cow basis (Bangar et al, 2015). In this study, 45% animals were positive for subclinical mastitis, which is very high for the farmers rearing small numbers of animals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 51%