A systematic literature review of the quality of evidence for injury and rehabilitation interventions in humanitarian crises

Abstract

IntroductionHumanitarian crises continue to pose a significant threat to health; the United Nations estimates that 144 million people are directly affected by conflict or environmental disasters. During most humanitarian crises, surgical and rehabilitative interventions remain a priority.ObjectivesThis review assessed the quality of evidence that informs injury and physical rehabilitation interventions in humanitarian crises.MethodsPeer-reviewed and grey literature sources were assessed in a systematic manner. Selected papers were evaluated using quality criteria based on a modified version of the STROBE protocol.Results46 papers met the inclusion criteria. 63 % of the papers referred to situations of armed conflict, of which the Yugoslav Wars were the most studied crisis context. 59 % of the studies were published since the year 2000. However, only two studies were considered of a high quality.ConclusionsWhile there is now a greater emphasis on research in this sector, the volume of evidence remains inadequate given the growing number of humanitarian programmes worldwide. Further research is needed to ensure a greater breadth and depth of understanding of the most appropriate interventions in different settings.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00038-015-0723-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Examining the use of economic evaluations in health-related humanitarian programmes in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

“…A number of systematic reviews have been conducted on evidence on the effectiveness of health interventions in humanitarian crises (Hall et al, 2011;Kimbrough et al, 2012;Tol et al, 2014;Ramesh et al, 2015;Ruby et al, 2015;Smith et al, 2015;Blanchet et al, 2017;Singh et al, 2018). However, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no systematic examination of the use of economic evaluations of health-related interventions in humanitarian settings.…”

Music of the brain approach to health protection

“…Modern society is characterized by a number of factors that induce stress-related disorders and pose a significant threat to public health, including humanitarian crises that directly affect millions of people through conflict or environmental disasters [1], and unemployment, which is a major concern due to its association with high mortality risk and mental health problems [2]. A more significant factor is work-related stress.…”

Early physical and functional rehabilitation of trauma patients in the Médecins Sans Frontières trauma centre in Kunduz, Afghanistan: luxury or necessity?

“…3 However, physiotherapy services are usually scarce in LMICs and not systematically implemented within trauma teams, 4,5 despite strong recommendations for early rehabilitation and continuum of care at community level. 6,7 Two recent literature reviews on ‘injury and rehabilitation in crisis contexts’ 8,9 outlined the lack of evidence-based literature in LMIC, and in particular, the tendency towards having studies focusing on one particular medical condition or body region (i.e., spinal cord injury, 10 amputation, 11 lower limb injury 12 ), a lack of consensus on outcome measures, 9 and the strong focus on surgical and medical care (versus rehabilitation). 8 …”