A systematic literature review of sustainable entrepreneurship with thematic analysis

Abstract

PurposeThis paper reviews the literature available on sustainable entrepreneurship along with the terms used interchangeably (as the context demands) and explores the themes research have undertaken to explain the concept across multidisciplinary avenues. The purpose of this literature review is to determine the direction of research in the field of sustainable entrepreneurship. It also enables the author to find out the relevance with similar terminologies, i.e. green entrepreneurship, ecopreneurship, ecological entrepreneuship etc. Also, how various differentiating concepts under the guise of sustainable entrepreneurship contribute to the similar goals on organizational level.Design/methodology/approachScopus and Web of Science databases are explored for research articles including term “sustainable entrepreneurship”. A list of 50 most cited articles is extracted from the results and analyzed for underlying themes and trends in current research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard is used to systematically search articles from two databases and filtering for the most relevant manuscripts.FindingsThe categorization of research articles is conducted to understand the direction of research in this field and the emphasis on specific aspects. Themes identified are further elaborated into subcategories to get to the underlying theme of the research article. The research trend implicates the shift toward practical application and evaluation along with conceptual exploration and analysis which is inherent in any field of research.Originality/valueThe literature review in primarily conducted on two most referred databases, i.e. Scopus and Web of Science, as the search for term “sustainable entrepreneurship” yeilded most results in these databases. Also the methodology adopted focused on the most cited articles in the past two decades to extract the themes and subthemes. This allows the researcher to determine the trends and gaps in the current research.

Sustainable Entrepreneurship: A Literature Review

“…As a result, the role of entrepreneurship in sustainability cannot be ignored. Ali [16] contributes to this notion, indicating that corporations organize economic and social life and determine ecological systems' capacity. This argument suggests the correlation between social, economic, and environmental aspects in sustainability, often referred to as the triple bottom line.…”

Green Jobs—A Literature Review

“…In terms of sustainability in general and of the concepts traditionally associated with it, there are a number of current reviews in the literature [9][10][11][12], to which we may add a study on green human resource management [13]. However, in the case of the specific concept of green jobs, a systematic analysis of the studies published so far in this field could not be identified.…”

Venture Capital Financing as A Driver for Entrepreneurship Development in Africa. A Literature Review and Future Research Agenda

“…Our literature review is based on peer reviewed articles which appeared in accredited international journals. We exclude study material not subject to the traditional academic peer-review process (Ali, 2021)Our choice was based on two aspects: First, journal articles are considered as authentic knowledge and have the ultimate impact on the distinct disciplines of research (Armstrong and Wilkinson, 2007). Second, this review seeks to be coherent with previous seminal review works in the field of VC financing and entrepreneurship development, which implemented comparable methodologies (Tykvova, 2017).…”

“…We examine prior literature in these four research areas, emphasising the research gaps, as well as the key challenges, and drawing insights that can help to advance VC and entrepreneurship research. By doing so, we discover that most of the empirical studies are based on small and unique samples, frequently too idiosyncratic to yield generalised findings (Tykvova, 2017;Ali, 2021).…”