2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-021-10732-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review of web-based student response systems: Advantages and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Mentimeter represents one of so-called the Audience-Response Systems (Mayhew, 2019;Wood & Shirazi, 2020) or Student Response Systems (Mohin et al, 2022). Audience-Response Systems are some of the student-centred and interactive technologies (Kocak, 2022) Using Audience-Response Systems students can answer the questions asked by the teacher via external devices or smartphones (Kocak, 2022). Systems analyse students' responses and present the results to the whole class as an abstract in a table, graph, or other methods (Kocak, 2022).…”
Section: The Ict Tools Used In People Analytics Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mentimeter represents one of so-called the Audience-Response Systems (Mayhew, 2019;Wood & Shirazi, 2020) or Student Response Systems (Mohin et al, 2022). Audience-Response Systems are some of the student-centred and interactive technologies (Kocak, 2022) Using Audience-Response Systems students can answer the questions asked by the teacher via external devices or smartphones (Kocak, 2022). Systems analyse students' responses and present the results to the whole class as an abstract in a table, graph, or other methods (Kocak, 2022).…”
Section: The Ict Tools Used In People Analytics Coursementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the meta-analysis by Castillo-Manzano et al (2016) only five out of 33 studies were conducted at preuniversity levels, of which none focused on mathematics learning, and only two at the primary school level: Agbatogun (2012) for ESL (English as a Second Language), and DeSorbo et al (2013), for health education, in which the use of ARS systems was found to be feasible among children to improve their communicative skills and interest, respectively. The predominance of these studies at university levels is also emphasised in a recent review of the literature (Kocak, 2022), in which the need for more studies at K-12 levels is highlighted. This statement is also justified by Moss and Crowley (2011), who emphasised that clickers can be used to engage students not only in higher education, but at any age.…”
Section: Practitioner Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the potential of LA, different literature reviews (Knobbout & Van Der Stappen, 2020; Li & Wong, 2020a) show that it is currently used to a lesser extent at elementary educational levels compared to higher educational stages. A similar situation exists with ARS, that have become increasingly integrated with LA to make use of the data collected (Li & Wong, 2020a), but where we also notice a scarcity of studies at the elementary level, which is why more research at the K‐12 level is needed, as evidenced (and requested) by several literature reviews (Castillo‐Manzano et al, 2016; Chien et al, 2016; Hunsu et al, 2016; Kocak, 2022). More specifically, the results presented in the meta‐analysis by Hunsu et al (2016) indicate that the use of clicker‐based technologies is associated with positive effects on non‐cognitive learning outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En particular, se ha encontrado que los gSRS generan una motivación positiva de los estudiantes por aprender (Iaremenko, 2017;Llerena & Rodríguez, 2017) El uso de los gSRS transmite una serie de beneficios al proceso docente (Caldwell, 2007;Kay & LeSage, 2009;Wentao et al, 2017). Se ha descubierto que estas tecnologías interactivas aumentan la asistencia, mejoran la capacidad de atención, promueven la discusión en el aula, hacen que las conferencias sean más divertidas, guían la revisión del pensamiento, diferencian la instrucción y brindan a los estudiantes oportunidades para la reflexión (Caldwell, 2007;Wang, 2015) hay una abundante literatura sobre las percepciones de los estudiantes sobre los gSRS en una amplia variedad de disciplinas (Kocak, 2021). Sin embargo, parece que una parte importante de estas investigaciones previas han puesto el foco en las evidencias cuantitativas, mientras que los estudios que han intentado utilizar métodos cualitativos son notablemente más escasos (Richardson et al, 2015).…”
Section: Revisión De La Literaturaunclassified