A systematic first-principles exploration of the impact of metal doping on the electronic properties of MOF MIP-177(Ti)

Lima, Larissa Lavorato; Tavares, Sérgio R.; Soares, Carla Vieira; Maurin, Guillaume; Leitão, Alexandre A.

doi:10.1016/j.micromeso.2023.112607

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 67 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3 However, it still has the disadvantages of easy destruction of imprinted cavities, difficult elution, too deep embedding of imprinted cavities, inhomogeneous imprinted sites, and difficult reabsorption in practical applications. 4 Based on this, the surface molecularly imprinted polymer (SMIP) technology, developed based on molecular imprinting technology, effectively solves these problems. This technology can produce relatively more and more uniformly distributed recognition sites and enhances the adsorption and separation properties of the imprinted material.…”

Section: ■ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mxene Quantum Dot Nanosurface Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Resonance Rayleigh Scattering Probe for Highly Sensitive and Selective Determination of Thiocyanate

Li,

Chen,

Wen

et al. 2024

Langmuir

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, a nanosurface molecularly imprinted polymer (MQD@MIP) resonance Rayleigh scattering (RRS) spectral probe for SCN − was prepared by sol−gel method, using Mxene quantum dot as a matrix, thiocyanate (SCN − ) as a template ion, (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES) as a functional monomer, tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as the crosslinker, and ammonia as the initiator. The probe produced an RRS peak at 370 nm and exhibits a strong RRS energy transfer (RRS-ET) effect when the MQD@MIP probe identifies SCN − . As the concentration of SCN − increased, the RRS-ET was enhanced, and the signal value of the system decreased linearly at 370 nm, with a determination range of 0.87−5.22 μg/L, and a detection limit of 0.37 μg/L SCN − . This detection method has the characteristics of simplicity, sensitivity, and specific recognition. The RRS method was used to determine SCN − in the sample, with relative standard deviation of 1.95−10.98% and recovery of 89.0−102.8%.

show abstract

Section: ■ Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%