2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Comparison of Roundtrip Software Engineering Approaches applied to UML Class Diagram

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following a detailed search of the available tools supporting the UML standard, Modelio [16] software was selected since it satisfies our needs and it is simple to use, moreover it provide a rich Java API for metamodel access and model transformation [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a detailed search of the available tools supporting the UML standard, Modelio [16] software was selected since it satisfies our needs and it is simple to use, moreover it provide a rich Java API for metamodel access and model transformation [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presented research has provided feedback to the SSP design group for upcoming standard development in terms of round-trip engineering [51,52]. That being said, the research has been realized successfully on industry-grade examples using SSP 1.0.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed method shows the class diagram in a known configuration and figures out the relationship between the instruction and the class diagram. The class diagram should be based on an obvious explanation of the consistency of the model used to locate likely inconsistencies [14].…”
Section: Class Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%