A system of notation for electro‐acoustic music: A proposition

Gariépy, Louise; Décarie, Jean

doi:10.1080/09298218408570441

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Concentrating on two types of "classical ' studio technique, transformation and synchronization, he notâtes technical relationships among various sound signals with the aid of number sequences. Gariépy and Décarie (1984) intend to develop a standardized system for the notation of realization scores (which they call "performance scores"). By means of alphanumeric codes and graphic symbols resulting from systematic rules they nótate technical procedures associated with the production, synchronizai ion and mixing of sounds as well as the performance of a piece in concert.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Notationsmöglichkeiten für elektronische Musik∗

Thies

1985

Interface

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Possibilities of electronic music notationAfter a discussion of the need for electronic music notation, the literature on this topic and the notational practice in existing electronic music scores are reviewed. A new system of notation integrating the main aspects of previous methods is outlined. The system combines information about technical procedures during the realization of a composition, physical data characterizing acoustic properties of sound signals and a description of the listener's aural perception. Interconnections among those different representations of each sound event as well as between the actual sound signals and their representations allow easy access to all information about any notated event and permit listening to the sounds at will. It is suggested that the notational system should be realized with the aid of the computer. * Dieser Aufsatz entstand im Rahmen des Forschungsprojekts "Notational System for Electronic Music", das die Hochschule für Musik und darstellende Kunst Hamburg gemeinsam mit dem Technion,

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%