2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthesis of the biological quality elements for the implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in the Mediterranean ecoregion: The case of Saronikos Gulf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1
13

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
66
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The ecoregion concept was developed to describe landscape characteristics that influence regional patterns of aquatic and terrestrial resources (Omernik, 1987). Subsequently, many studies have used the ecoregion concept to interpret regional biological phenomena and ecosystem function Roth et al, 1996;Butcher et al, 2003;Simboura et al, 2005;Borja et al, 2007). However, there is often less correspondence between spatial patterns of biological communities and ecoregional classification (Whittier et al, 1988;Pan et al, 1999;Potapova and Charles, 2002), probably because of the greater impact of local geomorphic factors (e.g., habitat alteration and destruction, channel straightening, and river bed modification) and disturbance factors (e.g., pollution), which interact in a complicated manner (Biggs et al, 1990).…”
Section: Spatial Patterns Of Diatom Distributions: Implications For Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecoregion concept was developed to describe landscape characteristics that influence regional patterns of aquatic and terrestrial resources (Omernik, 1987). Subsequently, many studies have used the ecoregion concept to interpret regional biological phenomena and ecosystem function Roth et al, 1996;Butcher et al, 2003;Simboura et al, 2005;Borja et al, 2007). However, there is often less correspondence between spatial patterns of biological communities and ecoregional classification (Whittier et al, 1988;Pan et al, 1999;Potapova and Charles, 2002), probably because of the greater impact of local geomorphic factors (e.g., habitat alteration and destruction, channel straightening, and river bed modification) and disturbance factors (e.g., pollution), which interact in a complicated manner (Biggs et al, 1990).…”
Section: Spatial Patterns Of Diatom Distributions: Implications For Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMBI (AZTI Marine Biotic Index) based on the study of [39], which considers five ecological groups ranging from sensitive species (EGI) to first-order opportunistic species (EGV) [43]. BENTIX considers only two groups: sensitive (GS) and tolerant species (GT), which correspond to ecological groups I and II, and to ecological groups III to V of the AMBI, respectively [44] [45]. The BO2A (Benthic Opportunistic Polychaete Amphipod index) is based on the ratio of opportunistic polychaetes (i.e.…”
Section: Biotic Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This index is designed for the assessment of the impact caused by general stress factors and does not discriminate amongst natural and anthropogenic disturbances . It has been tested successfully in a variety of Hellenic benthic ecosystems (SIMBOURA; ZENETOS, 2002), in areas subject to organic pollution such as Athens and the Saronikos gulf (SIMBOURA et al, 2005), and to oil spills (ZENETOS et al, 2004). Currently it is undergoing testing in other Mediterranean areas within the Water Framework Directive intercalibration exercise (VINCENT et al, 2002;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%