2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
104
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors from other countries indicate that there are many research approaches in resilience assessment [29,45,46] (this article considers the adaptability as part of this body), and the conclusion that comes from the analysis of this part of the literature on the subject is that it is recommended that a combination of many of research approaches is used [47]. Figure A3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors from other countries indicate that there are many research approaches in resilience assessment [29,45,46] (this article considers the adaptability as part of this body), and the conclusion that comes from the analysis of this part of the literature on the subject is that it is recommended that a combination of many of research approaches is used [47]. Figure A3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the result of variable importance by impurity reduction is biased (Strobl et al 2007), many researchers have verified and suggested choosing the MSE reduction method when permuting the variables (Ishwaran 2007;Strobl et al 2008). The MSE reduction method uses the MSE value of the Out-Of-Bag (OOB) data to evaluate the variable importance (Cai et al 2018). It is determined as follows:…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from challenges mentioned above regarding lack of data at multiple scales and a shortage of validation, verification, and benchmarking processes, challenges are posed by the lack of balanced representation across social, economic, and environmental systems within communities (Cai et al, 2018;Sharifi, 2016). Lack of representation and balance may indicate limited system understanding and the potential for poor or incomplete assessment results, depending upon the context and intent of assessment.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many community resilience indicator sets appear sparse regarding inclusion of the natural environment, focusing on tree density and impervious surface, and neglecting more complex aspects of community health. In a recent review of disaster resilience measures by Cai et al (2018), environmental and ecological indicators other than land use were found to be applied in six of 174 reviewed articles. Despite growing awareness of long-term resilience and its linkages to the quality and maintenance of natural resources (ecosystem services that provide essential lifeline support and protection mechanisms such as water quality, flood control, green spaces, biodiversity, etc.…”
Section: Current Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%