Abstract:In modern society, multitasking is necessary for a worker to accomplish a final goal by their deadline, which could be pursued for either a single goal or multiple goals. Moreover, a worker who has the authority to prioritize their tasks can make plans about the process of behavioral strategies to perform each task by making a to-do list. This strategy is a way of unpacking that which seems to affect the expectancy of goal attainment and heighten the value and importance of the goal. Otherwise, a worker could … Show more
“…In other words, no matter how much a user invests in the subject, they should be perceived as having the highest possible psychological ownership. It is expected that psychological ownership can be fully utilized in various areas in line with the researches that derive interesting insights based on recent consumer sentiment [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Second, Experiment 2 suggests that the greater the intangibility, the less the effect of relativity of investment.…”
The development of information technology, in an online context, has expanded into collective consumption, e.g., crowdfunding projects. Moreover, people feel a sense of psychological ownership (“it is mine”) toward projects they invest in, even if their attributes are immaterial or intangible. This research focuses on changes in psychological ownership based on the characteristics of crowdfunding projects, which are collectively invested in with others, and the attributes of objects (tangible/intangible). Specifically, this research seeks to determine how psychological ownership is affected by information about the amount of money invested by others in a shared project. Additionally, this research investigates whether psychological ownership changes based on others’ investment (less/more) and the attributes (tangible/intangible) of the project. The findings from the empirical analysis indicate that psychological ownership changes based on information regarding other people’s investment in a shared crowdfunding project. The results also show that, in projects with tangible attributes, psychological ownership changes based on investment information; however, no changes were observed in projects with intangible attributes.
“…In other words, no matter how much a user invests in the subject, they should be perceived as having the highest possible psychological ownership. It is expected that psychological ownership can be fully utilized in various areas in line with the researches that derive interesting insights based on recent consumer sentiment [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Second, Experiment 2 suggests that the greater the intangibility, the less the effect of relativity of investment.…”
The development of information technology, in an online context, has expanded into collective consumption, e.g., crowdfunding projects. Moreover, people feel a sense of psychological ownership (“it is mine”) toward projects they invest in, even if their attributes are immaterial or intangible. This research focuses on changes in psychological ownership based on the characteristics of crowdfunding projects, which are collectively invested in with others, and the attributes of objects (tangible/intangible). Specifically, this research seeks to determine how psychological ownership is affected by information about the amount of money invested by others in a shared project. Additionally, this research investigates whether psychological ownership changes based on others’ investment (less/more) and the attributes (tangible/intangible) of the project. The findings from the empirical analysis indicate that psychological ownership changes based on information regarding other people’s investment in a shared crowdfunding project. The results also show that, in projects with tangible attributes, psychological ownership changes based on investment information; however, no changes were observed in projects with intangible attributes.
“…It is known that in the project management field, the term "project" is defined as a temporary endeavor consisting of activities and tasks to be undertaken to create a unique product, service or result. It is also known that nowadays with the continuous development of technology and flexible changes in the organization, employees of many companies and industries work on multiple projects at the same time [30]. In addition, they handle not only various types of projects at the same time but also normal operations.…”
Section: Task Concurrencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his book "Brain rules: 12 Principles for Surviving and Thriving at Work, Home and School", a developmental molecular biologist Medina (2008) is writing that "…a person who is interrupted takes 50 per cent longer to accomplish a task and makes up to 50 per cent more errors" [29]. [17,24] Reduced reaction times and task completion rates x [3,29] Higher error rates x x [24,28,29,37] Longer task completion time x [37] Anxiety, frustration and confusion x [24] Psychological distress, reduced well-being and burnout x [13,30,37] Increased intrinsic motivation x [10] Increased project output x [3] Timely information transfer and advice provision x [19] Improved knowledge transfer effort and the acquisition of new routines x [3,9,10] Lower transaction costs x [10] Diminishing marginal returns x [3] Multitasking is also associated with a range of negative emotional costs such as anxiety, frustration, confusion [24], psychological distress and decreased well-being [20] and burnout [13].…”
Section: -3-multitasking Effects On Individuals and Organizationsmentioning
The objectives of this study were two-fold. First, to analyze multitasking activities in Knowledge Intensive Business Services (KIBS) and the employees’ perception of multitasking effects on individual and organizational performance. Second, to explore associations between the perception of multitasking and individual Time Management Orientation (TMO). The research study employed an online survey methodology. The questionnaire contained 56 questions organised in four groups. Methods of relationship analysis and regression analysis were applied to get answers to the research questions. The study indicated that the employees of surveyed KIBS were strongly engaged in multitasking activities in their workplaces. The informants estimated that on average they worked on nine different tasks per day. Additionally, their working days were filled with interruptions, caused either by external factors or self-interruptions. The majority of respondents also admitted that the ability to multitask was considered their job requirement, thus supporting the findings of other studies that KIBS do prefer multitasking employees. The effects of multitasking on individual and organizational performance were perceived ambiguously by the respondents. Meanwhile, the majority of respondents (above 70%), regardless of the level of polychronicity, admitted that they were able to make good decisions and concentrate better when they worked on one task at a time. The data analysis confirmed the findings reported earlier that individuals with more polychronic TMO did perceive multitasking as having more positive than negative effects both at the individual and organisational levels. Human multitasking has been widely researched in such fields as medicine, command and control, aviation, information technologies, but there is little detailed empirical evidence on multitasking in KIBS such as management consulting, research and development, architecture, engineering services, design, and advertising. Our research provides a fresh view on the human aspects of KIBS companies which can be of help in addressing the related managerial issues. The setting of the optimal number of tasks, task allocation considering employees’ individual differences, designing of workflows require further research as this may give the KIBS company managers guidelines and tools for organizing productive multitasking towards enhanced work efficiency and effectiveness and employees’ well-being.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.