A Survey on Standards for Interoperability and Security in the Internet of Things

Lee, Euijong; Seo, Young-Duk; Oh, Se-Ra; Kim, Young-Gab

doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3067354

Cited by 106 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the near future, vast number of things connected to the Internet will need an IPv6 address since the IPv4 address space will be effectively consumed [41]. Accordingly, IPv6 addressing is now desirable as it provides 2 128 unique addresses or approximately Presents a detailed review of the security-related challenges and sources of threat in the IoT applications Shapla Khanam et al [20] Presents an overview of IoT, its system architecture, enabling technologies, and discusses security challenges Bin Liao et al [21] Analyzes the security of IoT devices and provides the countermeasures in response to security problems and challenges by using mobile computing Salma et al [22] Presents the challenges of IoT security and the security requirements needed by IoT systems Vishal et al [23] Surveys the security, privacy and trust for Smart Mobile-Internet of Things Ismail et al [24] Presents a review of security attacks towards WSNs and IoT, along with the techniques for prevention, detection, and mitigation of those attacks Pawani et al [25] Surveys the security considerations with 6G enabling technologies Shalitha et al [26] Surveys the exploitation of Network Slicing for Internet of Things in 5G Networks Van-Linh Nguyen et al [27] Surveys the security and privacy issues based on prospective technologies for 6G Dinh C. Nguyen et al [28] Surveys wireless artificial intelligence applications in various data-driven domains Yasmine et al [29] Provides an up-to-date vision of the current research topics related to IoT security and propose a taxonomy of IoT attacks and analyze the security vulnerabilities of IoT at different layers Pasika et al [30] Analyse the security and privacy of the Multi-Access Edge Computing system Zhiyuan Yu et al [31] Surveys the security and privacy problems arising from the interaction of cyber world and physical world, with the context of broad cyber-physical applications Euijong Lee et al [32] Surveys the international standards related to interoperability and security for IoT environments Xing et al [33] Provides an overview of IoT equipment's physical security and safety, antitheft and antivandalism schemes along with circuit and system design, additional sensing devices, biometry and behavior analysis, and tracking methods Arup et al [34] Surveys the security and privacy threats for bluetooth low energy in IoT and wearable devices Lijun et al [35] Analyse various dimensions of trust, dynamic changes of context, privacy preserving, and cross-domain issues Jiani et al [36] Provides general security guidelines for IoT-enabled smart city developments, highlights common security challenges and reviews recent cryptographic security implementations for IoT-enabled smart cities Emilie et al…”

Section: Iot Ecosystemmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Architectural Framework on IoT Ecosystem, Security Aspects and Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Survey

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

For the past few years, the Internet of Things (IoT) technology continues to not only gain popularity and importance, but also witnesses the true realization of everything being smart. With the advent of the concept of smart everything, IoT has emerged as an area of great potential and incredible growth. An IoT ecosystem centers around innovation perspective which is considered as its fundamental core. Accordingly, IoT enabling technologies such as hardware and software platforms as well as standards become the core of the IoT ecosystem. However, any large-scale technological integration such as the IoT development poses the challenge to ensure secure data transmission. Perhaps, the ubiquitous and the resource-constrained nature of IoT devices and the sensitive and private data being generated by IoT systems make them highly vulnerable to physical and cyber threats. In this paper, we re-define an IoT ecosystem from the core technologies view point. We propose a modified three layer IoT architecture by dividing the perception layer into elementary blocks based on their attributed functions. Enabling technologies, attacks and security countermeasures are classified under each layer of the proposed architecture. Additionally, to give the readers a broader perspective of the research area, we discuss the role of various state-of-the-art emerging technologies in the IoT security. We present the security aspects of the most prominent standards and other recently developed technologies for IoT which might have the potential to form the yet undefined IoT architecture. Among the technologies presented in this article, we give a special interest to one recent technology in IoT domain. This technology is named IQRF that stands for Intelligent Connectivity using Radio Frequency. It is an emerging technology for wireless packet-oriented communication that operates in sub-GHz ISM band (868 Mhz) and which is intended for general use where wireless connectivity is needed, either in a mesh network or pointto-point (P2P) configuration. We also highlighted the security aspects implemented in this technology and we compare it with the other already known technologies. Moreover, a detailed discussion on the possible attacks is presented. These attacks are projected on the IoT technologies presented in this article including IQRF. In addition, lightweight security solutions, implemented in these technologies, to counter these threats in the proposed IoT ecosystem architecture are also presented. Lastly, we summarize the survey by listing out some common challenges and the future research directions in this field.INDEX TERMS Cyber attacks, IoT architecture, Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystem, IQRF, Network security.

show abstract

Section: Iot Ecosystemmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Novel Architectural Framework on IoT Ecosystem, Security Aspects and Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Survey

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The security of IoT, IIoT, and CPS environments is a very broad field of research, and it is possible to find a myriad of studies. Without going into much detail, we refer the readers to the works of Butun et al [15] and Makhdoom et al [5] for extensive overviews of vulnerabilities, threats, and attacks, the security surveys of Lee et al [16] on IoT standards and Granjal et al [17] on the existing IoT protocols, the study of Neshenko et al [7] for a recent comprehensive IoT security survey, the study of Sikder et al [18] for a survey of threats to IoT sensors, the study of Humayed et al [3] for an extensive survey on the threats, vulnerabilities, attacks, and defense solutions to CPS, the survey of Al-Garadi et al [19] for machine and deep learning techniques for IoT security, the comprehensive survey of Yu et al [10] for CPS security and Cintuglu et al [20] for CPS testbeds. There are also studies like that of Babun et al [21] which develop innovative ways to protect networks with vulnerable IoT devices.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey of Honeypots and Honeynets for Internet of Things, Industrial Internet of Things, and Cyber-Physical Systems

Franco¹,

Arış²,

Canberk³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT), the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT), and Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) have become essential for our daily lives in contexts such as our homes, buildings, cities, health, transportation, manufacturing, infrastructure, and agriculture. However, they have become popular targets of attacks, due to their inherent limitations which create vulnerabilities. Honeypots and honeynets can prove essential to understand and defend against attacks on IoT, IIoT, and CPS environments by attracting attackers and deceiving them into thinking that they have gained access to the real systems. Honeypots and honeynets can complement other security solutions (i.e., firewalls, Intrusion Detection Systems -IDS) to form a strong defense against malicious entities. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the research that has been carried out on honeypots and honeynets for IoT, IIoT, and CPS. It provides a taxonomy and extensive analysis of the existing honeypots and honeynets, states key design factors for the state-of-the-art honeypot/honeynet research and outlines open issues for future honeypots and honeynets for IoT, IIoT, and CPS environments.

show abstract

“…IoT is far behind in realizing its true potential due to the lack of interoperability. The most comprehensive review on security standards and interoperability goals is presented by Lee et al [19]. To comprehensively review the existing architectures, protocols, and standards is one of the promising means to address the interoperability issues in IoT and other challenges.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

State-of-the-Art Review on IoT Threats and Attacks: Taxonomy, Challenges and Solutions

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) plays a vital role in interconnecting physical and virtual objects that are embedded with sensors, software, and other technologies intending to connect and exchange data with devices and systems around the globe over the Internet. With a multitude of features to offer, IoT is a boon to mankind, but just as two sides of a coin, the technology, with its lack of securing information, may result in a big bane. It is estimated that by the year 2030, there will be nearly 25.44 billion IoT devices connected worldwide. Due to the unprecedented growth, IoT is endangered by numerous attacks, impairments, and misuses due to challenges such as resource limitations, heterogeneity, lack of standardization, architecture, etc. It is known that almost 98% of IoT traffic is not encrypted, exposing confidential and personal information on the network. To implement such a technology in the near future, a comprehensive implementation of security, privacy, authentication, and recovery is required. Therefore, in this paper, the comprehensive taxonomy of security and threats within the IoT paradigm is discussed. We also provide insightful findings, presumptions, and outcomes of the challenges to assist IoT developers to address risks and security flaws for better protection. A five-layer and a seven-layer IoT architecture are presented in addition to the existing three-layer architecture. The communication standards and the protocols, along with the threats and attacks corresponding to these three architectures, are discussed. In addition, the impact of different threats and attacks along with their detection, mitigation, and prevention are comprehensively presented. The state-of-the-art solutions to enhance security features in IoT devices are proposed based on Blockchain (BC) technology, Fog Computing (FC), Edge Computing (EC), and Machine Learning (ML), along with some open research problems.

show abstract

A Survey on Standards for Interoperability and Security in the Internet of Things

Cited by 106 publications

References 63 publications

A Novel Architectural Framework on IoT Ecosystem, Security Aspects and Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Survey

A Novel Architectural Framework on IoT Ecosystem, Security Aspects and Mechanisms: A Comprehensive Survey

A Survey of Honeypots and Honeynets for Internet of Things, Industrial Internet of Things, and Cyber-Physical Systems

State-of-the-Art Review on IoT Threats and Attacks: Taxonomy, Challenges and Solutions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About