2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11633-020-1225-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Modelling and Compensation for Hysteresis in High Speed Nanopositioning of AFMs: Observation and Future Recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it accurately represents the machine's basic characteristics and performance. It should be noted that the proposed method is also applicable to all types of PMSM [18]. Hence, this model will serve as the reference machine model.…”
Section: ░2 Development Of Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it accurately represents the machine's basic characteristics and performance. It should be noted that the proposed method is also applicable to all types of PMSM [18]. Hence, this model will serve as the reference machine model.…”
Section: ░2 Development Of Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hysteresis models for PEAs are mainly classified in two main categories: physical and phenomenological [19]. The first-mentioned group is a description of the ferromagnetic effect that produces the non-linearity, although the material dependency and complex numerical solutions are the downsides of these theories [20,21]. In regards to the phenomenological, the sub-classification is related to the ones based on differential equations (Dunhem [22], Backslash [23] and Bouc-Wen [24]), operator models (Preisach [5], Prandtl-Ishlinskii [25] and Krasnoselskii-Pokrovskii [26]) and polynomial models [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two different approaches for hysteresis modeling: mathematical-and physicsbased [58]. The first kind contemplates the most used ones, like Preisach, Prandtl-Ishlinksii, and Krasnosel'skii-Pokrovkii models [59][60][61], which are based on hysteron operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its complexity, recent cutting edge uni-axial phenomenological models have been developed which are rate and material independent and they only require a history variable [64,65]. The physics-based ones are known as the Domain Wall and the Jiles-Atherton model; these are acknowledged for their description of hysteresis present in magnetic materials and might be unsuitable since they are material-dependent models [58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%