A Survey on Measuring Cognitive Workload in Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

The ever-increasing number of computing devices around us results in more and more systems competing for our attention, making cognitive workload a crucial factor for the user experience of human-computer interfaces. Research in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) has used various metrics to determine users’ mental demands. However, there needs to be a systematic way to choose an appropriate and effective measure for cognitive workload in experimental setups, posing a challenge to their reproducibility. We present a literature survey of past and current metrics for cognitive workload used throughout HCI literature to address this challenge. By initially exploring what cognitive workload resembles in the HCI context, we derive a categorization supporting researchers and practitioners in selecting cognitive workload metrics for system design and evaluation. We conclude with three following research gaps: (1) defining and interpreting cognitive workload in HCI, (2) the hidden cost of the NASA-TLX, and (3) HCI research as a catalyst for workload-aware systems, highlighting that HCI research has to deepen and conceptualize the understanding of cognitive workload in the context of interactive computing systems.

TicTacToes: Assessing Toe Movements as an Input Modality

“…Besides the technical limitations, questions remain on how to handle external factors, such as the cognitive demand of the interaction [49], the shape, or cut of the footwear. Such external factors will influence the freedom of movement of the toes and thus their efficiency and accuracy in the interaction.…”

XR-based technical instructions in organized testing: User behaviour and design performance

“…In a task that requires assembling a physical structure, complete immersion of VR is an issue unless the use purpose is for remote assembling, whereby a robot or other augmented technology undertakes the physical actions. Ordinarily, removal from the immediate physical environment and negotiation between the two spaces (virtual and real) increases cognitive workload (Andersen et al 2016;Kosch et al 2023).…”

Integration of IoT and blockchain for decentralized management and ownership in the metaverse

“…As conceived by Stephenson, the metaverse was a domain wherein human avatars interact with each other and software agents, within a 3D space that amalgamated both human‐designed virtual environments and real‐world representations. The once speculative concept is now materializing into concrete technological developments poised to transform human–computer interactions 8 . Current interpretations envision the metaverse as an interactive, immersive, and shared virtual domain serving as a digital extension of our physical world.…”

“…The once speculative concept is now materializing into concrete technological developments poised to transform human-computer interactions. 8 Current interpretations envision the metaverse as an interactive, immersive, and shared virtual domain serving as a digital extension of our physical world. Users within this space can explore, socialize, and collaborate in real-time.…”