2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Automatic Detection of Voice Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is also in line with results reported in [13]. Table VI shows the results for the continuous speech sentences in the SVD database with individual feature sets (FS-1 to FS-7) and combination of feature sets (FS-8 to FS- It is worth noting that there exist studies in the literature [4], [67], [82] which report detection performance superior to that obtained in this study, but many of those studies have only included a small portion of the database and/or limited the analyses to a restricted number of pathologies. It is observed that the trend in the results reported in this paper are in line with the results reported in [13], [85].…”
Section: Pathology Detection Experimentssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This observation is also in line with results reported in [13]. Table VI shows the results for the continuous speech sentences in the SVD database with individual feature sets (FS-1 to FS-7) and combination of feature sets (FS-8 to FS- It is worth noting that there exist studies in the literature [4], [67], [82] which report detection performance superior to that obtained in this study, but many of those studies have only included a small portion of the database and/or limited the analyses to a restricted number of pathologies. It is observed that the trend in the results reported in this paper are in line with the results reported in [13], [85].…”
Section: Pathology Detection Experimentssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Regarding classifiers, several known techniques, such as kNN, GMM, LDA, HMM, ANN, CNN and SVM, have been used for pathological voice [25], [27], [40], [58]- [66]. Among the different classifiers, SVM has been found to be the most suitable classifier for voice pathology detection [67]. More details of various classifiers and machine learning techniques used for voice pathology detection can be found in the recent review published in [67].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main novelty of the study consists of the acquisition and analysis of voice samples collected through smartphones. Indeed, although a few studies have previously used smartphones to collect voice samples in patients with voice disorders [ 60 , 61 , 62 ], so far no authors have used this methodological approach to examine age-related changes of voice. The use of smartphones allows a simplified procedure of voice recordings and open to the acquisition of a large amount of data collected in an ecologic scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of salient features from the whole features is needed to reduce the misclassification error rate [8]. Some of the popular techniques for dimensional reduction are GA, Principal Component Analysis, ReliefF, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Higher-Order Singular Value Decomposition, Fisher Discrimination Ratio and Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance [12]. According to Roffo [13], the overfitting chances increase with the number of features, therefore, feature selection can improve algorithms performance and classification accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%