2011
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2011.6069710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey on facilities for experimental internet of things research

Abstract: The initial vision of the Internet of Things (IoT) was of a world in which all physical objects are tagged and uniquelly identified by RFID transponders. However, the concept has grown into multiple dimensions, encompassing sensor networks able to provide real-world intelligence and goal-oriented collaboration of distributed smart objects via local networks or global interconnections such as the Internet. Despite significant technological advances, difficulties associated with the evaluation of IoT solutions u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
222
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 476 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
222
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Gluhak at al. realize the need for including human behavior in the loop of experimentation on the Internet of things, because the location, mobility, and activity of the "things" are related to humans [287].…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Gluhak at al. realize the need for including human behavior in the loop of experimentation on the Internet of things, because the location, mobility, and activity of the "things" are related to humans [287].…”
Section: Mobilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of gathering performance evaluation from actual mobile devices without the help of location and connection emulators also highlight the logistical difficulty of performing such real life tests given the lack of dedicated testbed tools. Indeed, even though experiments have become more prominent in the community [24], most of the open available testbeds are sensor oriented [14] and few include smartphones (an exception includes SmartSantander [27] which provides a SmartCity testbed) and to the best of our knowledge none of them is targetted at off-theshelf mobile devices on which people centric social media in proximity would run. Thus, we argue that this is an important research gap, which needs to be addressed in order to support larger scale validation of communication middleware and services for mobile social newtorking in proximity.…”
Section: Tales From the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in cloud platforms [5] such as Samsung Artik or IBM IoT there are the device simulation modules which are able to generate randomized data in order to verify the processing in the clouds. At the same time, WSN testbeds [6] are designed to verify low level interactions between devices. Such testbeds constitutes of several, sometimes even hundreds or thousands, of nodes deployed in the particular place.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%