A Survey of User-centric Identity Management Technologies

Maliki, Tewfiq El; Seigneur, Jean-Marc

doi:10.1109/secureware.2007.4385303

Cited by 71 publications

(39 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…So far, all initiatives to achieve it have not succeeded; a global PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) has been deemed not feasible. Social and federated logins [21], even though useful, cannot be tied properly to a real-world identity because identities can be easily faked: for example, fake and zombie Facebook accounts are still a problem. Of course, if linking the user client with its real-world identity is done via strong authentication, the legal liability of the user client can be enforced but otherwise the hotspot sharer may be deemed liable in many countries.…”

Section: Hotspot Security and Remaining Threatsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wi-Trust: Computational Trust and Reputation Management for Stronger Hotspot 2.0 Security

Seigneur

2017

JICTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In its list of top ten smartphone risks, the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security ranks network spoofing attacks as number 6. In this paper, we present how we have validated different computational trust and reputation management techniques by means of implemented prototypes in real devices to mitigate malicious legacy Wi-Fi hotspots including spoofing attacks. Then we explain how some of these techniques could be more easily deployed on a large scale thanks to simply using the available extensions of Hotspot 2.0, which could potentially lead to a new standard to improve Wi-Fi networks trustworthiness.

show abstract

Section: Hotspot Security and Remaining Threatsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wi-Trust: Computational Trust and Reputation Management for Stronger Hotspot 2.0 Security

Seigneur

2017

JICTS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to El Maliki et al [17] there are some basic rules which have been considered in the new user-centric identity paradigm, specifically: 1) Enhancing the user privacy by providing them full control over their identity information 2) Usability and user experience quality as a result of consistent identity interface and using the same identity for each identity transaction 3) Decreasing identity attacks, including phishing 4) Reducing reachability/disturbances caused by spams 5) Policy specification on both sides, identity providers and service providers 6) Profiting from huge scalability 7) Providing secure conditions at the time of data exchange 8) Separating the digital data from applications.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying and Prioritizing Evaluation Criteria for User-Centric Digital Identity Management Systems

Banihashemi¹,

Homayounvala²,

Talebpour³

et al. 2016

ijacsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Identity Management systems are used for securing digital identity of users in reliable, automated and compatible way. Service providers employ identity management systems which are cost effective and scalable but cause poor usability for users. Identity management systems are user-centric applications which should be designed by considering users' perspective. User centricity is a remarkable concept in identity management systems as it provides more powerful user control and privacy. This approach has been evolved from amending past paradigms. Thus, evaluation of digital identity management systems based on users' point of view, is really important. The main objective of this paper is to identify the appropriateness of the criteria used in evaluation of user-centric digital identity management systems. These criteria are gathered from the literature and then categorized into four groups for the first time in this work to examine the importance of each parameter. In this approach, several interviews were performed as a qualitative research method and two questionnaires have been filled out by forty six users who were involved with identity management systems. Since the answers are perception based data the most important criteria in each category are assessed by using fuzzy method. This research found that the most important criteria are related to security category. The results of this research can provide valuable information for managers and decision makers of hosting companies as well as system designers to adapt and develop appropriate user-centric digital identity management systems.

show abstract

“…So far, all initiatives to achieve it have not succeeded; a global PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) has been deemed not feasible. Social and federated logins [14], …”

Section: Hotspots Security and Remaining Threatsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wi-trust: Improving Wi-Fi hotspots trustworthiness with computational trust management

Seigneur

2015

2015 ITU Kaleidoscope: Trust in the Information Society (K-2015)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

A Survey of User-centric Identity Management Technologies

Cited by 71 publications

References 3 publications

Wi-Trust: Computational Trust and Reputation Management for Stronger Hotspot 2.0 Security

Wi-Trust: Computational Trust and Reputation Management for Stronger Hotspot 2.0 Security

Identifying and Prioritizing Evaluation Criteria for User-Centric Digital Identity Management Systems

Wi-trust: Improving Wi-Fi hotspots trustworthiness with computational trust management

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About