1978
DOI: 10.1016/0093-691x(78)90113-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of the incidence of prenatal mortality in cattle following pregnancy diagnosis by rectal palpation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
3

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
28
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is notable, however, that the reported rate and incidence of PL does vary widely between studies, and 6.9% is higher than some previously reported rates (0.4 and 3.6%; [13,28]) and it is lower than the rates (10.2 and 10.6%) reported in other studies [23,24]. These discrepancies may reflect differences in the geography, the study population, the case definitions and the procedures among the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is notable, however, that the reported rate and incidence of PL does vary widely between studies, and 6.9% is higher than some previously reported rates (0.4 and 3.6%; [13,28]) and it is lower than the rates (10.2 and 10.6%) reported in other studies [23,24]. These discrepancies may reflect differences in the geography, the study population, the case definitions and the procedures among the studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Investigators in some studies suggested that PRP had little or no effect on pregnancy loss [21][22][23]. Conversely, other reports suggested that PRP during early gestation increased pregnancy loss [24][25][26][27][28][29]. However, these studies had important limitations in their design as previously reported [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Palpating the amnion or the fetal membranes may injure the fetus and could become a significant iatrogenic cause of fetal losses [1,4,15,[20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%