2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00501.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of the accuracy of interpretation of intraoperative cholangiograms

Abstract: The present study shows that the accuracy of detection of both normal and variants of normal anatomy was poor in all grades of surgeon irrespective of a policy of routine or selective IOC. Improving operators' understanding of biliary anatomy may help to increase the diagnostic accuracy of IOC interpretation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BDI is associated with a mortality rate of 12.5%, and increased the mortality rate of patients undergoing LC (3.9% compared with 1.1% at one year) . Achieving the ‘critical view of safety’ via dissection of Calot's triangle and IOC have both been advocated as gold standard for preventing BDI in LC . Routine IOC was found to reduce the incidence of BDI by up to 50–70% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BDI is associated with a mortality rate of 12.5%, and increased the mortality rate of patients undergoing LC (3.9% compared with 1.1% at one year) . Achieving the ‘critical view of safety’ via dissection of Calot's triangle and IOC have both been advocated as gold standard for preventing BDI in LC . Routine IOC was found to reduce the incidence of BDI by up to 50–70% .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, IOC will not prevent the occurrence of all BDI . It has also been shown that IOCs may often be misinterpreted . Nonetheless, at a population level routine IOC is likely to be cost‐effective .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is impossible to reflect retrospectively whether the anomalies were identified and subsequently not recorded on the operative report or whether they were not recognized. In a study by Sanjay et al . 15 IOCs were digitalized, de‐identified and interpreted by consultant surgeons and trainees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is impossible to reflect retrospectively whether the anomalies were identified and subsequently not recorded on the operative report or whether they were not recognized. In a study by Sanjay et al 28 15 IOCs were digitalized, de-identified and interpreted by consultant surgeons and trainees. As in our study, there was a trend of improved reporting accuracy when surgeons were stratified by seniority, with 30% of consultants correctly identifying variants of normal biliary anatomy compared with 25% of trainees.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%