2007
DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Self-reported Outcome Instruments for the Foot and Ankle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
172
0
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(107 reference statements)
3
172
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…110,114,120 The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific instrument designed to assess activity limitations and participation restrictions for individuals with general musculoskeletal foot and ankle disorders. 81 This includes those with Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of a 21-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale and separately scored 8-item Sports subscale.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…110,114,120 The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a region-specific instrument designed to assess activity limitations and participation restrictions for individuals with general musculoskeletal foot and ankle disorders. 81 This includes those with Achilles tendinopathy. It consists of a 21-item Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscale and separately scored 8-item Sports subscale.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded none of the existing measures could claim to be valid for patient perceptions of outcome [33]. More recently, Martin and Irrgang [27] comprehensively surveyed self-reported outcome instruments for various foot and ankle disorders and identified 14 different instruments. Five of these measures had some evidence to support their use relative to content validity, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Martin and Irrgang [27] comprehensively surveyed self-reported outcome instruments for various foot and ankle disorders and identified 14 different instruments. Five of these measures had some evidence to support their use relative to content validity, construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness [27]. These reports, however, focused on available scores to assess the outcomes of foot and ankle surgery in general or focused only on self-reported questionnaires and did not comprehensively consider outcome instruments in TAA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…167 This includes those who sustained an ankle sprain. It consists of the 21-item activities of daily living (ADL) and separately scored 8-item sports subscales.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,73,108,167,169 Three instruments have evidence supporting their use after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction: the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, 212 Karlsson Ankle Function Score, 137 and Kaikkonen score. 133 Out of all instruments identified, 6 have evidence to support their use for individuals with impairments of body function and structure, activity limitations, and participation restrictions associated with lateral ankle sprains.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%