2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2014.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of personalized treatment models for pricing strategies in insurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ada: Square loss with n estimators=100. [5,10,20,40]. Parameter selection is conducted by validation because of the time constraint.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ada: Square loss with n estimators=100. [5,10,20,40]. Parameter selection is conducted by validation because of the time constraint.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new subject is simply assigned to the empirically best treatment as measured on the K training data that are closest to it. Several tree-based algorithms have been proposed for uplift modeling, each with a different splitting criterion [8] [1] [9] [4] [10]. In [8], the authors modify the standard decision tree construction procedure [11] by forcing a split on the treatment at each leaf node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The performance of UCTS is compared with those of 6 other methods which are the separate model approach with Random Forest (SMA-RF), Support Vector Machine (SMA-SVM), Adaboost (SMA-Ada), K-Nearest Neighbors (SMA-KNN), as well as the uplift Random Forest method implemented in [11], and CTS. The data is randomly split into the training set (225,000 samples per treatment) and the test set (75,000 samples per treatment).…”
Section: Priority Boarding Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They show how models of personalized treatment learning can be used to select the policy holders that should be targeted in marketing strategies of a company [28].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%