2013
DOI: 10.5402/2013/204346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey of Organ Equivalent and Effective Doses from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures

Abstract: The quantification of radiation risks associated with radiological examinations has been a subject of interest with the increased use of X-rays. Effective dose, which is a risk-weighted measure of radiation to organs in the body associated with radiological examination, is considered a good indicator of radiological risk. We have therefore investigated patient effective doses from radiological examinations. Organ and effective doses were estimated for 94 patients who underwent computed tomography examinations … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
33
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
33
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the mean ESD of different organs reported in all the other countries shows a wide range and reflects a large standard deviation. Compared to the other countries, the calculated ESDs in this study were greater than that reported in Canada (25), Serbia (26) and Serbia (28). The use of a suitable radiographic technique, with appropriate xray tube voltages and sufficient beam filtration is the probable reason for the low doses obtained in these countries in comparison with the others (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…It should be noted that the mean ESD of different organs reported in all the other countries shows a wide range and reflects a large standard deviation. Compared to the other countries, the calculated ESDs in this study were greater than that reported in Canada (25), Serbia (26) and Serbia (28). The use of a suitable radiographic technique, with appropriate xray tube voltages and sufficient beam filtration is the probable reason for the low doses obtained in these countries in comparison with the others (21).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The another way to assess organ doses as mentioned above is indirect method through measurement of CT dose indexes (CTDI) and published conventional factors obtained from Monte Carlo simulation and mathematical phantoms [21] [28]- [33]. Generally, the estimation of organ doses for CT procedures requires the user to supply CTDI 100 air, tube current (mA), tube rotation time(s), and pitch values for running simulation programs [34]. In practice, a CTDI can be measured using a pencil ionization chamber with an active length of 100 mm so CTDI 100 expressed in terms of absorbed dose to air (mGy).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now various MC data based programs like ImPACT [42], Org Dose [34], CT-EXPO [43] etc. were produced for calculating patient dose in CT applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variation of exposure dose have been noted by many scholars [23][24][25][26] even among same aged patients and size, which indicates the influence of other parameters affecting the general exposure dose. However the data also revealed that: the ESD for the requested cases (abdomen, skull and the chest radiographs) have been increased following the aging in a linear significant correlation (R 2 = 0.9) that could be fitted to equation of the form: y = 0.2119x + 0.9714, y = 0.1475x + 0.865 and y = 0.0356x + 0.0536 respectively; where x refers to the age in years and y refers to ESD in mGy as shown in Figure (6).…”
Section: Discussion and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%