A Survey of Multi-View Photogrammetry Software for Documenting Vehicle Crush

Abstract

Video and photo based photogrammetry software has many applications in the accident reconstruction community including documentation of vehicles and scene evidence. Photogrammetry software has developed in its ease of use, cost, and effectiveness in determining three dimensional data points from two dimensional photographs. Contemporary photogrammetry software packages offer an automated solution capable of generating dense point clouds with millions of 3D data points from multiple images. While alternative modern documentation methods exist, including LiDAR technologies such as 3D scanning, which provide the ability to collect millions of highly accurate points in just a few minutes, the appeal of automated photogrammetry software as a tool for collecting dimensional data is the minimal equipment, equipment costs and ease of use. This paper evaluates the accuracy and capabilities of four automated photogrammetry based software programs to accurately create 3D point clouds, by comparing the results to 3D scanning. Both a damaged and undamaged vehicle were documented with video and photographs and on average the damaged vehicle set returned more data points with higher accuracy than the undamaged vehicle set. Four cameras types were evaluated and more accurate results were achieved when using either a DSLR or a point-and-shoot camera than when using a GoPro, or a cell phone camera. Photogrammetry data from video footage was analyzed and found to be both less accurate and to return less data than photographs. By limiting the number of photographs used, it was found that a photogrammetry solution could be achieved with as few as 16 photographs encircling a vehicle, but better results were reached with a larger number of photographs.

Focus stacking photogrammetry for micro‐scale roughness reconstruction: a methodological study

“…To control the reconstruction process, the user has direct access to multiple, explicit reconstruction parameters. The components in (1), (2) and (3) are wrapped within VisualSFM, which provides a user‐friendly graphic interface to control the reconstruction. According to software benchmarks (Schöning and Heidemann, ; Terpstra et al., ; Bianconi et al., ), the VisualSFM workflow provides high‐quality results in terms of their accuracy and precision, but, in general, the performance of SfM software can be highly case‐dependent.…”

Self-Calibrated In-Process Photogrammetry for Large Raw Part Measurement and Alignment before Machining

“…are used, enabling dense 3D surface meshing and reconstruction. In-process camera model self-calibration techniques are integrated, demonstrating the capability of 3D surface reconstruction and modelling using consumer grade low-cost cameras [ 41 , 42 , 43 ]. However, strong limitations can be found for taking these texture-based approaches to precise industrial metrology.…”

Reconstruction of 3d Accident Scene From Multirotor Uav Platform

“…When an accident happens, it is possible to get photographic images or video recordings of the traffic accident scene immediately. In addition, documentation can be obtained even after removal of the vehicles from the accident scene in the case where traces of the accident site and the vehicles final positions are appropriately highlighted (Terpstra et al, 2016). Other than that, UAVs can have multiple applications in an investigation scene, such as photography, videotaping, search for evidence, safety assessment, examination of sites which are difficult or near impossible to reach.…”