2020
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2020-451-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction of 3d Accident Scene From Multirotor Uav Platform

Abstract: Abstract. Traffic accidents are one of the major causes of fatality in developing countries. The aim of the study is to reconstruct accident scenes by using UAV photogrammetry. The methodology of this study is organised into four main phases which consist of preliminary work, flight planning, 3D model processing and analysis of the results. The 3D model was successfully generated by using Point of Interest (POI) flight planning. The 3D model showed that the results of the process produced good 3D texture where… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amin et al [24] stated that the accuracy for the POI technique was 0.059 m and the waypoint technique was 0.043 m. Desai et al [34] mentioned that the scale errors of 3D reconstructed accident scene using the waypoint technique was about 0.039 m. Almeshal et al [35] achieved the accuracy of 3D accident scenes was about 0.047 m. This study has produced 3D results of accident scenes with an accuracy of 0.047 m for the circular technique and 0.06 m for the double grid technique. Therefore, the results achieved in this study were nearly similar to the previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amin et al [24] stated that the accuracy for the POI technique was 0.059 m and the waypoint technique was 0.043 m. Desai et al [34] mentioned that the scale errors of 3D reconstructed accident scene using the waypoint technique was about 0.039 m. Almeshal et al [35] achieved the accuracy of 3D accident scenes was about 0.047 m. This study has produced 3D results of accident scenes with an accuracy of 0.047 m for the circular technique and 0.06 m for the double grid technique. Therefore, the results achieved in this study were nearly similar to the previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the efficiency of this proof of concept, we compared a few studies to our own study, evaluating major parameters like root mean square error (RMSE), using/not using GCPs, flight time, overlaps of images, etc. The authors of [7] used two techniques for data acquisition (waypoints and points of interest). RMSE was 43 mm and 59 mm, respectively, flight height was approx.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We positioned three cars (A, B, C) to simulate a real traffic accident, around which we set rectangular (1, 2, 3, 4) and round (8) objects with known dimensions and three points designated to the distance measurements (5,6,7). After each of the flights, we measured three distances between given points (5,6,7). The trajectory of the third flight is also depicted.…”
Section: Proposed Rpas Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations