1965
DOI: 10.1017/s0022172400045344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of enteroviruses and adenoviruses in the faeces of normal children aged 0–4 years: A report of the Public Health Laboratory Service and the Society of Medical Officers of Health

Abstract: In a survey of enterovirus and adenovirus excretion in normal children in 1961–62, 25,600 faecal specimens were examined, 25,589 of them in cell culture and 17,596 in newborn mice.Polioviruses were isolated from 156 (0·86%) specimens before Sabin vaccination was introduced in February 1962 and from 389 (5·27%) specimens after this. Coxsackie A viruses were isolated from 894 (5·08%) specimens, Coxsackie B viruses from 196 (0·77%), echoviruses from 278 (1·09%) and adenoviruses from 128 (0·50%).The isolation rate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enteroviruses and adenoviruses are often present in faeces of normal children under 5 years of age [4], so that the results of routine laboratory investigations have to be interpreted cautiously [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enteroviruses and adenoviruses are often present in faeces of normal children under 5 years of age [4], so that the results of routine laboratory investigations have to be interpreted cautiously [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been noticed recently that adenoviruses in general, appear to have a greater predilection for growth in the intestinal tract than in the respiratory tract. There are many reports concerning the predominant growth of adenoviruses in the intestines of apparently healthy humans [3,5,7,10,14,16] and in human cases with enteric disorder [4,6,15]. Even in respiratory diseases with or without enteric symptoms, virus isolation appears to be more favorable from fecal specimens rather than from throat swabs [11,19,21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%