2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2012.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the error is null if the estimated clasŝis the same as the real class (wherê= 1 and = 1 means that the estimated and real class of the scenario are safe, respectively, = = 2 means failed,̂= = 3 means NMs, and̂= = 4 means PIs), whereas in the second way (2) is calculated as the Manhattan distance between the real and the predicted class by the following equation:…”
Section: Design Of the Aggregation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the error is null if the estimated clasŝis the same as the real class (wherê= 1 and = 1 means that the estimated and real class of the scenario are safe, respectively, = = 2 means failed,̂= = 3 means NMs, and̂= = 4 means PIs), whereas in the second way (2) is calculated as the Manhattan distance between the real and the predicted class by the following equation:…”
Section: Design Of the Aggregation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can make the computational cost for scenario postprocessing enormous and the retrieved information difficult to interpret [1][2][3][4]. The main goal of postprocessing is the classification of the dynamic scenarios generated as safe, failed, Near Misses (NM), and Prime Implicants (PIs) clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, a Dynamic probabilistic Safety Margin (DSM) approach is proposed in this paper, based on time-dependent phenomenological models of stochastic system evolution including possible dependencies between failure events [Aldemir, 2013]. For this, we introduce a novel definition of a DSM by the combined quantification of a percentile (e.g., 95 th ) of the safety parameter distribution (e.g., oil temperature, peak cladding temperature) and a percentile (e.g., 5 th ) of the distribution of the earliest time required to the safety parameter to reach the given percentile value.…”
Section: Notation and List Of Acronymsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic reliability approaches [Siu, 1994;Devooght, 1997;Marseguerra et al, 1998;Labeau et al, 2000;Dufour et al, 2002;Di Maio et al, 2009;Aldemir, 2013] [Aldemir, 2013;Zio, 2014] and as a by-product for the quantification of operational safety margins within a dynamic reliability scheme [Zio et al, 2012].…”
Section: Notation and List Of Acronymsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some approaches have been recently proposed in the nuclear community, which make use of sophisticated softwares that combine methodologies for risk assessment with very accurate thermohydraulic codes (Alfonsi et al, 2015;Alfonsi et al, 2016;Izquierdo et al, 2009), to perform the so-called Integrated Deterministic Probabilistic Safety Assessment (IDPSA) (Aldemir, 2013;Zio, 2014) or…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%