2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/2709109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Postprocessing of Accidental Scenarios by Semi-Supervised Self-Organizing Maps

Abstract: Integrated Deterministic and Probabilistic Safety Analysis (IDPSA) of dynamic systems calls for the development of efficient methods for accidental scenarios generation. The necessary consideration of failure events timing and sequencing along the scenarios requires the number of scenarios to be generated to increase with respect to conventional PSA. Consequently, their postprocessing for retrieving safety relevant information regarding the system behavior is challenged because of the large amount of generated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most evident difference between DETs and static ETs is that while ETs are constructed by expert analysts that draw their branches based on success/failure criteria set by the analysts, in DETs, these are spooned by a software that embeds the (deterministic) models simulating the plant dynamics and the (stochastic) models of components failure. Naturally, the DET generates a number of scenarios much larger than that of the classical static FT/ET approaches, so that the a posteriori retrieval of information can become quite burdensome and complex [125][126][127]. Another challenge is related to the relevant effort in terms of computational time required for generating a large number of time-dependent accident scenarios by means of Monte Carlo techniques that are typically employed to deeply and thoroughly explore the entire system state-space, and to cover in principle all the possible combinations of events over long periods of time.…”
Section: Integration Of Passive Systems Into Dynamic Psamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most evident difference between DETs and static ETs is that while ETs are constructed by expert analysts that draw their branches based on success/failure criteria set by the analysts, in DETs, these are spooned by a software that embeds the (deterministic) models simulating the plant dynamics and the (stochastic) models of components failure. Naturally, the DET generates a number of scenarios much larger than that of the classical static FT/ET approaches, so that the a posteriori retrieval of information can become quite burdensome and complex [125][126][127]. Another challenge is related to the relevant effort in terms of computational time required for generating a large number of time-dependent accident scenarios by means of Monte Carlo techniques that are typically employed to deeply and thoroughly explore the entire system state-space, and to cover in principle all the possible combinations of events over long periods of time.…”
Section: Integration Of Passive Systems Into Dynamic Psamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the "a posteriori" retrieval of information can be quite burdensome and difficult. In this view, artificial intelligence techniques could be embraced to address the problem [125][126][127]; iii.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this approach, we can find some methodological work [113,114] and others related to biology and medicine, such as a mining study on biological data [115]. Concerning engineering, there is a selection of variables to group road samples [116] and post-processing of accident scenarios [117]. Related to economics and business, there is a discovery of preferences in stock trading [118], focused on this approach of "SOM + decision trees".…”
Section: Hybrid Model-som and Decision Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%