2015
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2015.2422672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Surface PEEC Formulation for High-Fidelity Analysis of the Current Return Networks in Composite Aircrafts

Abstract: This paper describes the approach developed to model the current return networks installed aboard aircrafts having parts made in composite materials. The surface partial element equivalent circuit (PEEC) method is adopted for its high-fidelity modeling capabilities, and its accuracy in the low-frequency region, which is of interest for the characterization of the return networks. State of the art of PEEC modeling is implemented in order to allow real-life aircrafts to be modeled. A special complex mock-up has … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where m and ς m are the volume and surface magnetic charges, respectively. Like (13) and 14, m and ς m are related to J m by means of charge conservation relations:…”
Section: Mot-peec Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where m and ς m are the volume and surface magnetic charges, respectively. Like (13) and 14, m and ς m are related to J m by means of charge conservation relations:…”
Section: Mot-peec Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integral equation (IE) methods are particularly suited for the study of electromagnetic (EM) devices in unbounded domains since they do not require the introduction of artificial absorbing boundary conditions for truncating the computational domain and they avoid the discretization of regions with the characteristic of vacuum [1][2][3]. In particular, the Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) method, introduced by Ruehli in 1972 [4], has been shown to be well suited for the analysis of several classes of EM devices, such as interconnecting [5,6] antennas [7][8][9], and other complex electric and electronic devices [10][11][12][13]. IE methods such as the PEEC approach are widely used for time-harmonic EM problems and they are also particularly suited for transient analysis, usually performed by means of traditional time-stepping algorithms, e.g., forward and backward Euler, Crank-Nicolson, and Runge-Kutta methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, (13) corresponds to the incomplete circuit equations (U = ZI): the circuit is not closed (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: B Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical PEEC was limited to structured meshes, but this limitation has recently been overcome by a Nonorthogonal PEEC formulation [10] or by using face elements [11], [12] for general meshes. This major improvement enables the treatment of more complex geometries and devices [13]. In practice, the PEEC method is mostly used to model conductors and resistive, inductive and capacitive effects [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one is represented by the circuit simulation of the resulting equivalent circuit, in both the time and the frequency domains, which is typically computationally expensive for real‐life structures. An example of the use of the PEEC method in the analysis of complex platforms is reported in Bandinelli et al To speedup the equivalent circuit analysis, fast multipole–based techniques as well as the adaptive cross approximation have been used, or effective model‐order reduction techniques can be adopted leading to compact models preserving the accuracy at the ports and the physical properties of the original system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%