2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005jf000348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A surface mass balance model for the Greenland Ice Sheet

Abstract: [1] A surface mass balance model aimed at being coupled to a Global Circulation Model (GCM) for future climate prediction is described and tested for the Greenland Ice Sheet. The model builds on previous modeling designed to be forced by automatic weather station data, and includes surface energy balance as well as processes occurring near the surface such as water percolation and refreezing. Surface albedo is calculated with a new scheme that differentiates the timescale for aging of wet and dry snow and inco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
120
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(99 reference statements)
1
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the PDDM calculates the mass balance as a direct response to temperature change, the EBSM mass balance depends strongly on the surface albedo value, and the expansion of the runoff limit inland can be explained for the most part by surface albedo feedbacks. These depend on the snowpack and surface properties [Brun et al, 1992;Oerlemans and Knap, 1998;Warren, 1982;Zuo and Oerlemans, 1996], as well as on the ice sheet geometry (which affects the speed of meltwater transport) [Bougamont et al, 2005;Knap and Oerlemans, 1996;Zuo and Oerlemans, 1996]. The surface albedo value drops as melt increases, removing snow from the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas the PDDM calculates the mass balance as a direct response to temperature change, the EBSM mass balance depends strongly on the surface albedo value, and the expansion of the runoff limit inland can be explained for the most part by surface albedo feedbacks. These depend on the snowpack and surface properties [Brun et al, 1992;Oerlemans and Knap, 1998;Warren, 1982;Zuo and Oerlemans, 1996], as well as on the ice sheet geometry (which affects the speed of meltwater transport) [Bougamont et al, 2005;Knap and Oerlemans, 1996;Zuo and Oerlemans, 1996]. The surface albedo value drops as melt increases, removing snow from the surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the PDDM parameters used here have been derived from field observations and are relatively realistic [Braithwaite, 1995;Lefebre et al, 2002]. The EBSM was originally tuned to match in-situ observations of mass balance along the K-Transect [Bougamont et al, 2005] and ETH-Camp [Greuell and Konzelmann, 1994] in southwest Greenland. Moreover, the EBSM tunable parameters expected to have the greatest impact on mass balance affect mostly the melt generation (via the surface albedo as well as the timescale for runoff formation), and less so the refreezing processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Modeled surface mass balance (SMB) of the GrIS is highly sensitive to surface albedo (Bougamont and Bamber, 2005;Fitzgerald et al, 2012;Tedesco et al, 2011), owing to the positive melt-albedo feedback, which results in lower albedo in high-melt years (Stroeve, 2007). Following recent warming, a persistent drop in GrIS surface albedo has been observed in satellite data and climate models (Box et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%