2006
DOI: 10.1002/hup.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A 1HMRS study of the anterior cingulate gyrus in euthymic bipolar patients

Abstract: We did not find a significant difference in the NAA/Cr and Cho/Cr ratio between bipolar patients and healthy controls. Chronic administration of psychotropic drugs could have had an effect on NAA/Cr levels of bipolar patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the mechanistic contributions have yet to be definitively elucidated, changes to the 1 H-MRS choline resonance are believed to reflect non-steady state alterations to the rate of membrane synthesis and breakdown, and/or changes in cell density (Rae, 2014). In addition to the findings reported here in adolescents, studies in adults with BD have found no difference in choline between BD and healthy controls (Amaral et al, 2006; Kraguljac et al, 2012; Scherk et al, 2009). However, because the tCho concentration is known to display regional differences in normal brain of up to 46% (Bracken et al, 2011), is thought to vary with mood state (Charles et al, 1994), and can potentially be affected by drugs lithium and valproic acid (Moore et al, 2000; Silverstone et al, 2004), our findings must be considered limited in their applicability to the ACC, in depressed patients not currently taking mood stabilizing medications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Although the mechanistic contributions have yet to be definitively elucidated, changes to the 1 H-MRS choline resonance are believed to reflect non-steady state alterations to the rate of membrane synthesis and breakdown, and/or changes in cell density (Rae, 2014). In addition to the findings reported here in adolescents, studies in adults with BD have found no difference in choline between BD and healthy controls (Amaral et al, 2006; Kraguljac et al, 2012; Scherk et al, 2009). However, because the tCho concentration is known to display regional differences in normal brain of up to 46% (Bracken et al, 2011), is thought to vary with mood state (Charles et al, 1994), and can potentially be affected by drugs lithium and valproic acid (Moore et al, 2000; Silverstone et al, 2004), our findings must be considered limited in their applicability to the ACC, in depressed patients not currently taking mood stabilizing medications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The findings from the present study are in agreement with some papers that did not find differences in brain metabolite levels in the prefrontal cortex of bipolar patients compared to healthy controls [ 15 , 26 ]. Also, these results could be explained by the use of the same methodology, such as only evaluating BD I patients under strict criteria of euthymia; assessed patients had been receiving lithium alone for a long time or associated with another psychiatric drug, including other mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, and antidepressants.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…While some cross-sectional studies involving euthymic BD patients mostly on lithium treatment have reported similar NAA levels and similar or lower NAA/tCr ratio compared with healthy controls in anterior cingular cortex (ACC), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and frontal cortex (FC) (Amaral et al, 2006; Brambilla et al, 2005; Hamakawa et al, 1999; Molina et al, 2007), higher NAA/tCr ratio in lithium-treated BD patients has also been found in DLPFC (Brambilla et al, 2005). Euthymic BD patients who were medication free for at least 2 weeks have been found to have lower DLPFC NAA/tCr ratio (Winsberg et al, 2000), whereas manic/mixed patients have been reported to have decreased NAA levels in medial orbital prefrontal cortex and similar NAA levels in DLPFC compared with healthy controls (Cecil et al, 2002; Michael et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%