2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2ta03042j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sulfur-containing polymer-plasticized poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolyte enables highly effective lithium dendrite suppression

Abstract: Herein, a multifunctional S-containing polymer filler to enhance PEO-based composite polymer electrolyte is reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO electrolyte exhibits a much higher t Li + of 0.81 (Figure 3e) relative to the PEO counterpart (0.22) (Figure S11) and even surpassing most reported PEO-based solid electrolytes involving different functional fillers under comparable conditions. [6,20,21,[23][24][25][47][48][49] As indicated in Figure S3 and S12, at 30 °C, the ionic conductivity and t Li + of the 0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO SPE are 2.65×10 À 5 S cm À 1 and 0.37, higher than 0.5 %CNF-COP@PEO SPE (1.90×10 À 5 S cm À 1 and 0.33), indicating the promoting role of crystalline structure, while 0.5 %CNF-COP@PEO SPE outperforms 0.5 %F-COP @PEO SPE (1.16×10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 0.22) and 0.5 %CN-COP@-PEO SPE (1.46×10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 0.27), implying the key role of -CN and F dual-decoration in Li ion conduction, consistent with the theoretical prediction. Similar trends are also observed in term of the ionic conductivity at 60 °C: CNF-COF@PEO > CNF-COP@PEO > CN-COP@PEO > F-COP@PEO > COP@PEO (Figure S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO electrolyte exhibits a much higher t Li + of 0.81 (Figure 3e) relative to the PEO counterpart (0.22) (Figure S11) and even surpassing most reported PEO-based solid electrolytes involving different functional fillers under comparable conditions. [6,20,21,[23][24][25][47][48][49] As indicated in Figure S3 and S12, at 30 °C, the ionic conductivity and t Li + of the 0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO SPE are 2.65×10 À 5 S cm À 1 and 0.37, higher than 0.5 %CNF-COP@PEO SPE (1.90×10 À 5 S cm À 1 and 0.33), indicating the promoting role of crystalline structure, while 0.5 %CNF-COP@PEO SPE outperforms 0.5 %F-COP @PEO SPE (1.16×10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 0.22) and 0.5 %CN-COP@-PEO SPE (1.46×10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 0.27), implying the key role of -CN and F dual-decoration in Li ion conduction, consistent with the theoretical prediction. Similar trends are also observed in term of the ionic conductivity at 60 °C: CNF-COF@PEO > CNF-COP@PEO > CN-COP@PEO > F-COP@PEO > COP@PEO (Figure S4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cycling performance metric surpasses almost all literature-reported results using various PEO-based SPE under comparable conditions (Figure 6f). [6,20,21,23,25,48,49,53] Notably, at a higher LFP loading of 4.9 mg cm À 2 , the Li/0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO SPE/LiFePO 4 cell yields an initial capacity of 137.2 mAh g À 1 at 0.2 C with impressive capacity retention of 97.2 % over 500 cycles (Figure 6h). At 50 °C, the 0.5wt %CNF-COP@PEO SPE equipped battery can also perform well and deliver the initial discharge capacity of 89 mAh g À 1 at 2 C with a large retention of 98.8 % after 260 cycles (Figure S27).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO electrolyte exhibits a much higher t Li + of 0.81 (Figure 3e) relative to the PEO counterpart (0.22) (Figure S11) and even surpassing most reported PEO-based solid electrolytes involving different functional fillers under comparable conditions. [6,20,21,[23][24][25][47][48][49] As indicated in Figure S3 and S12, at 30 °C, the ionic conductivity and t Li + of the 0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO SPE are 2.65×10 À 5 S cm À 1 and 0.37, higher than 0.5 %CNF-COP@PEO SPE (1.90×10 À 5 S cm À 1 and 0.33), indicating the promoting role of crystalline structure, while 0.5 %CNF-COP@PEO SPE outperforms 0.5 %F-COP @PEO SPE (1.16×10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 0.22) and 0.5 %CN-COP@-PEO SPE (1.46×10 À 5 S cm À 1 , 0.27), implying the key role of -CN and F dual-decoration in Li ion conduction, consistent with the theoretical prediction. Similar trends are also observed in term of the ionic conductivity at 60 °C: CNF-COF@PEO > CNF-COP@PEO > CN-COP@PEO > F-COP@PEO > COP@PEO (Figure S4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such cycling performance metric surpasses almost all literature-reported results using various PEO-based SPE under comparable conditions (Figure 6f). [6,20,21,23,25,48,49,53] Notably, at a higher LFP loading of 4.9 mg cm À 2 , the Li/0.5 %CNF-COF@PEO SPE/LiFePO 4 cell yields an initial capacity of 137.2 mAh g À 1 at 0.2 C with impressive capacity retention of 97.2 % over 500 cycles (Figure 6h). At 50 °C, the 0.5wt %CNF-COP@PEO SPE equipped battery can also perform well and deliver the initial discharge capacity of 89 mAh g À 1 at 2 C with a large retention of 98.8 % after 260 cycles (Figure S27).…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous strategies have been explored to improve the ionic conductivity of PEO-based polymer electrolytes. The most frequently reported methods include some simpler techniques like the introduction of inorganic fillers, , addition of various additives, plasticizers, plastic crystals, porous frameworks, , and other complicated methods like copolymerization, , cross-linking, , etc. The incorporation of inorganic nanoparticles or porous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) as fillers into the polymer matrix is successful in improving the ionic conductivity of the solid polymer electrolyte to a certain extent .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%