1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(98)00141-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
190
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 461 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
190
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the prominent objective weight approach includes; Standard Deviation weight method (Baruah & K, 1999), Shannon's entropy weight method (Chaghooshi, et al, 2012) which are some referred to as a subjective and objective method, and finally the objective and subjective weight method (Ma, Fan, & Huang, 1999). In this study, we aimed to presents a reliable, easy and straightforward approach for determining criteria weight by using both subjective and objective factors in forming a fuzzy-based AHP model for solving selection, prioritization, and decision-making problems.…”
Section: Criteria Weight Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the prominent objective weight approach includes; Standard Deviation weight method (Baruah & K, 1999), Shannon's entropy weight method (Chaghooshi, et al, 2012) which are some referred to as a subjective and objective method, and finally the objective and subjective weight method (Ma, Fan, & Huang, 1999). In this study, we aimed to presents a reliable, easy and straightforward approach for determining criteria weight by using both subjective and objective factors in forming a fuzzy-based AHP model for solving selection, prioritization, and decision-making problems.…”
Section: Criteria Weight Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the weighting methods can be classified into two main approaches, subjective and objective approaches [10]. The objective approach depends heavily on the quantitative intrinsic information contained in each criterion, where the information is manipulated mathematically to generate new information such as the standard deviation, entropy, correlation, and variation coefficient [11,12,13].…”
Section: Weighting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Majority of them can be classified into subjective and objective approaches depending on the information provided. There are two weighting categories: subjective and objective methods (Ma et al 1999). The subjective methods determine weights solely according to the preference or judgments of decision makers, and then some mathematic methods such as the eigenvector method, weighted least square method, Delphi method, and mathematical programming models are applied to calculate the overall evaluation of each decision maker.…”
Section: The Proposed Fmcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, α and β represent the coefficients of objective and subjective weights, respectively. Total weights of all criteria, W T j , are obtained using the following formula (Ma et al 1999): To investigate the impact of coefficients on the selection of the alternative with best environmental performance, we conducted the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: The Proposed Fmcdm Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%