2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2020.2964295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Subject-Specific Four-Degree-of-Freedom Foot Interface to Control a Surgical Robot

Abstract: In robotic surgery, the surgeon controls robotic instruments using dedicated interfaces. One critical limitation of current interfaces is that they are designed to be operated by only the hands. This means that the surgeon can only control at most two robotic instruments at one time while many interventions require three instruments. This paper introduces a novel four-degree-of-freedom foot-machine interface which allows the surgeon to control a third robotic instrument using the foot, giving the surgeon a "th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained with adaptive foot interfaces for robot control e.g. 60 , where data-driven approaches are used to create subject-specific motion mapping, are in line with our findings. Huang et al 60 report that inter-subject variability decreases once a subject-specific motion mapping is enabled.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results obtained with adaptive foot interfaces for robot control e.g. 60 , where data-driven approaches are used to create subject-specific motion mapping, are in line with our findings. Huang et al 60 report that inter-subject variability decreases once a subject-specific motion mapping is enabled.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…73 , where data-driven approaches are used to create subject-specific motion mapping, are in line with our findings. Huang et al 73 report that inter-subject variability decreases once a subject-specific motion mapping is enabled. This confirms the dependency of robot control performance on metrics inherent to each subject, which we present here to be a combination of motor coordination metrics relating to the task and the robotic interface.…”
Section: A B Pj Ft Fud T Ft Fud T Fud S Pt Plsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, because the lower limbs are usually used for walking, there are many studies on walking, but few studies on robotic manipulation with the legs. Several studies dealt with a robot manipulation using four DOFs of a lower limb: forward/backward and left/right foot movements and the dorsiflexion/plantarflexion and the valgus/varus of the ankle [18]- [19]. Komori et al studied robot operation by lower limb movement and experimentally showed that the lower limb is inferior to the upper limb for six-DOF operation in terms of time by approximately 79% and the subjective operability evaluation by approximately 39%, but the operability of the lower limb may be relatively close to that of the upper limb in terms of position operation [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the natural hands in both tri-manual and typical bi-manual operations is analysed to check the effect that the addition of SRLs has on the performance of the natural limbs in different task scenarios. The tri-manual operation system consists of two hand interfaces, one foot interface [142], and a virtual-reality testing environment. The hand interface is the Omega.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system uses natural foot gestures controlling the flexible endoscope in four DoFs based on isomorphic mapping. The foot interface collects continuous foot gestures, providing foot support and positioning assistance while minimizing the operation fatigue [142].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%