2001
DOI: 10.1207/s15327566ijce0502_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study on the Error Occurrence and Human Information Processing Time Influenced by the Fluctuation of Working Memory Resource Capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Wickens, Xu, Helleberg, and Marsh (2001) suggested effort conservation as the explanation for why pilots in a simulated aviation task actually devoted more visual attention to an instrument panel when the task was easier. Finally, the concept of fluctuating resource pools has been aired by Karashima and Saito (2001), in their proposed fluctuation of working memory hypothesis. Although these authors presented a very detailed explanation of how capacity fluctuates, they failed to offer any reasoning as to why it does so (see also Young & Stanton, 2002, for a discussion of working memory vs. attentional resource models).…”
Section: Malleable Attentional Resources Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Wickens, Xu, Helleberg, and Marsh (2001) suggested effort conservation as the explanation for why pilots in a simulated aviation task actually devoted more visual attention to an instrument panel when the task was easier. Finally, the concept of fluctuating resource pools has been aired by Karashima and Saito (2001), in their proposed fluctuation of working memory hypothesis. Although these authors presented a very detailed explanation of how capacity fluctuates, they failed to offer any reasoning as to why it does so (see also Young & Stanton, 2002, for a discussion of working memory vs. attentional resource models).…”
Section: Malleable Attentional Resources Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%