1986
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760261908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study on polymer blending microrheology: Part IV. The influence of coalescence on blend morphology origination

Abstract: The influence of shear induced coalescence on the origination of morphologies in polymer blending processes is investigated both theoretically and experimentally. In the theoretical part a route is proposed to estimate the fraction of collisions between disperse phase domains in simple shear flow that result in an actual coalescence. It was shown that under polymer blending conditions this "coalescence probability" is only substantial if the polymer/ polymer interfaces exhibit a high degree of mobility. In the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
127
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, the local collision frequency linearly increases with the offset in the velocity gradient direction [13]. To take this into account, the coalescence efficiency is not defined as the maximum initial offset up to which coalescence occurs, but as the square of this maximum offset [13,50]. Since in the confined case there is also a lower critical initial offset below which coalescence is not possible, the coalescence efficiency for the confined case can be extended to:…”
Section: Coalescence Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the local collision frequency linearly increases with the offset in the velocity gradient direction [13]. To take this into account, the coalescence efficiency is not defined as the maximum initial offset up to which coalescence occurs, but as the square of this maximum offset [13,50]. Since in the confined case there is also a lower critical initial offset below which coalescence is not possible, the coalescence efficiency for the confined case can be extended to:…”
Section: Coalescence Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancies between theoretical predictions on structure development and experimental results [4][5][6][7][8][9] are, most likely, due to the complex interfacial properties of, and the mutual interaction between, the polymers. In many cases mutual solubility is considered to be negligible for practical purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases mutual solubility is considered to be negligible for practical purposes. [4][5][6][10][11][12] This seems reasonable since the polymers consist of long molecules, and mixing of those molecules is thermodynamically unfavorable. 13 Moreover, polymers possess a high ͑macroscopic͒ viscosity ͓typically from O͑1-10 3 ͒Pa s͔ and therefore mutual diffusion if present, is expected to be slow ͑the mutual diffusion coefficient is of the order of 10 −13 cm 2 / s and smaller 14 ͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this modification of the PC/PVDF interface by PMMA has a favorable effect on both the interfacial tension and the interfacial adhesion, further improvement of this situation is expected to result from the interfacial formation of a graft copolymer between PC and PMMA. Block and graft copolymers at polyblend interface are indeed known to improve the interfacial adhesion and to inhibit phase coalescence [24][25][26].…”
Section: Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%