Abstract:If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series … Show more
“…Namely, it is typical for, and expected of, advertising communication to be exaggerated and emotionally intensified. Therefore, figurative language is generally normative for advertising (Campbell and Kirmani 2000;Rotfeld and Torzoll 1980;Simonson and Holbrook 1993;Toncar and Fetscherin 2012;Xu and Wyer 2010). But user-generated content is a form of natural language in interpersonal communication.…”
Section: Communicational Differences Between Advertising and User-genmentioning
“…Namely, it is typical for, and expected of, advertising communication to be exaggerated and emotionally intensified. Therefore, figurative language is generally normative for advertising (Campbell and Kirmani 2000;Rotfeld and Torzoll 1980;Simonson and Holbrook 1993;Toncar and Fetscherin 2012;Xu and Wyer 2010). But user-generated content is a form of natural language in interpersonal communication.…”
Section: Communicational Differences Between Advertising and User-genmentioning
“…Consumers are not buying the fragrance alone, but the imagery that becomes intimately associated with the fragrance. " [13]. The data in our study suggest that such promises outweigh the health effects experienced by fragrance exposure.…”
Section: General Populationmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…In the case of perfumes, the promise to become attractive is very prominent in the advertisements. Toncar and Fetscherin analyzed the visual puffery in the ubiquitous use of imagery-laden ads in the promotion of personal fragrances [13]. They describe that fragrances might be "a fantasy product, intimately connected to the self-esteem or self-image and perceived desirability and attractiveness of the buyer.…”
Background: According to a national representative survey, 19.9% of the German population describe various adverse effects on personal health upon exposure to fragranced consumer products. This study investigates whether these fragrance-sensitive persons have a higher risk awareness compared to the general public, whether they show a different safety behavior concerning fragrances and whether they reduce exposure and hence risk. Results: The presence of fragrances can have a major impact on the participation in public activities. Half of the fragrance-sensitive persons have ever been prevented from going to some place to avoid exposure to fragrances. More than half of them prefer fragrance-free alternatives (products, laundry, hotels, airplanes, health care facilities, or workplaces), while there are also fragrance-sensitive individuals, who indicate to prefer fragranced products and spaces. Half of fragrance-sensitive persons use perfumes to feel themselves more attractive. Furthermore, there is a large number of persons who prefer fragrance-free alternatives without being fragrance-sensitive. Around half of the general population indicate not to use a fragranced product if they know that it emits hazardous air pollutants. This shows that health effects associated with the presence of fragrances proved to be one out of several factors, but not the only one, which influences attitudes towards fragrances and their usage. The answers given reveal the multitude of aspects influencing risk awareness and safety behavior. According to the survey results, 7.4 workdays were lost due to illness from fragranced product exposure in the workplace per person on average, with estimated personal economic costs of 14.5 * 10 9 Euro/year in Germany. Conclusions: The high prevalence of persons who correlate their health effects with exposure to fragrances shows that existing risk communication instruments are too weak, even for people who are aware of a risk, like fragrancesensitive persons. The data substantiate how important it is to respect cognitive dissonance, confirmation bias and the inadequacy of the deficit model in risk management. The issue of adverse health effects associated with fragrances has reached a dimension, which requires immediate action: The results of this study are strong supporting arguments in favor of fragrance-free policies.
“…Previous studies have also explored situational factors such as abstraction of puffery, consumer involvement, and interruption during information processing that could potentially moderate the effect of puffery on consumer brand attitude. For example, Toncar and Fetscherin (2012) investigated fragrance advertisements in three magazines using semiotic analysis and revealed the existence of visual puffery. Gao and Scorpio (2011) and Gao et al (2012) studied the effect of product involvement and puffery on ad truthfulness and brand attitude.…”
Section: Effect Of Puffery On Brand Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, this study examined only verbal puffery in advertisements that have been investigated in numerous empirical studies (e.g., Cowley, 2006;Gao & Scorpio, 2011;Haan & Berkey, 2002;Hoek & Gendall, 2007). However, puffery may be presented in various forms in the real marketplace, such as visual puffery (Fetscherin & Toncar, 2009;Toncar & Fetscherin, 2012) and visual hyperbole (Callister & Stern, 2007). As holistic thinkers tend to pay more attention to the whole picture than analytic thinkers, and analytic thinkers tend to pay more attention to the details of a picture than holistic thinkers, holistic thinkers and analytic thinkers might understand visually exaggerated advertisements differently.…”
Previous empirical studies have yielded contradictory results about how consumers react to puffed claims in advertisements. This study addresses this issue by considering how consumers' thinking style and competitors' puffery interact to influence consumers' brand attitude in terms of product puffery. Drawing upon experiments using fictitious and real brand names, three studies provide converging evidence that holistic thinkers will form a more positive brand attitude when exposed to the target brand's low‐puffery (vs. no puffery or high puffery) claims. In contrast, analytic thinkers are less sensitive to puffery, and their brand attitude will not change. Further, holistic thinkers are more sensitive to the presence of competitor's puffery. Holistic thinkers exposed to competitor's high‐puffery (vs. low) claims form a more positive brand attitude toward the target brand. For analytic thinkers, competitor's puffery level will not significantly affect their attitude toward the target brand. Our findings shed fresh light on the inconclusive results of prior studies and offer practical implications for marketing puffery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.