2015
DOI: 10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20150545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of transfusion related adverse events at a tertiary care centre in North India: an initiative towards hemovigilance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
21
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
4
21
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In our present study, males were more affected than females similar to the study by Kumar et al [14]. However, Sidhu et al in their study found that females are more affected than males [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our present study, males were more affected than females similar to the study by Kumar et al [14]. However, Sidhu et al in their study found that females are more affected than males [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A total of 32 (0·15%) ATRs were documented in 32 patients (16 male and 16 female patients), and the relative incidence of transfusion reactions by total blood components issued was found to be 0·19, 0·10 and 0·06% by PRCs, platelets and FFP, respectively. Types of transfusion reactions observed in this study and their comparison to other national and international studies are depicted in Table (Khalid et al ., ; Bhattacharya et al ., ; Sousa Neto & Barbosa, ; Haslina et al ., ; Payandeh et al ., ; Gao et al ., ; Negi et al ., ; Sidhu et al ., ; Owusu‐Ofori et al ., ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overall incidence of acute adverse reactions in our study was 0·15%, which is lower than the results various haemovigilance systems over the globe have reported. A study performed in India reported an incidence of 0·27% (Sidhu et al ., ). Another study performed in a health‐care centre in India reported an incident rate of 0·2% (Negi et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(10) The incidence of adverse transfusion reactions reported in another one study was only 0.082%. (11) A study in Switzerland (12) and the Quebec haemovigilance system (13) reported transfusion reaction rates of 0.042% and 0.035% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%