2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2005.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the void size effect based on the Taylor dislocation model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(85 reference statements)
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When voids become smaller and comparable to the internal material length parameter, void growth is significantly suppressed consistent with findings of Hutchinson (1997, 2001), Huang et al (2000), and Liu et al (2003Liu et al ( , 2005. This has the effect of increasing the attainable stress level and the strain at the onset of void coalescence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When voids become smaller and comparable to the internal material length parameter, void growth is significantly suppressed consistent with findings of Hutchinson (1997, 2001), Huang et al (2000), and Liu et al (2003Liu et al ( , 2005. This has the effect of increasing the attainable stress level and the strain at the onset of void coalescence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is reported in a number of investigations for hydrostatic loading by Fleck and Hutchinson (1997), Huang et al (2000) and Fleck and Hutchinson (2001), and for axisymmetric loading conditions by Liu et al (2003Liu et al ( , 2005, Wen et al (2005), Tvergaard and Niordson (2004) and Niordson andTvergaard (2006, 2007). Similar size effects are observed in metal matrix composites (Lloyd, 1994) which are well captured by gradient theories of plasticity (Bittencourt et al, 2003;Niordson, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The plasticity size effects mentioned above have been attributed to geometrically necessary dislocations (GNDs) associated with non-uniform plastic deformation in small volumes (Nye, 1953;Ashby, 1970;Gao and Huang, 2003). Strain gradient plasticity theories (e.g., Poole et al, 1996;Fleck and Hutchinson, 1993;Gao et al, 1999;Huang et al, 2000;Gurtin, 2002) have been developed to describe size dependent behavior for problems with an externally imposed strain gradient, such as bending, torsion and indentation (Fleck et al, 1994;Gao et al, 2015;Xue et al, 2002) as well as in problems where plastic gradients develop as a consequence of constrained plasticity, such as in void growth and composite materials (Liu et al, 2005;Huang et al, 2000;Bittencourt et al, 2003). As a few of these cited works already suggest, another approach to analyzing plasticity at these size scales is Discrete Dislocation Plasticity (DDP) in which plastic deformation emerges from the nucleation and motion of discrete dislocations in an elastic background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extent ahead of the crack tip where strain gradients play an important role suggests that gradient enhanced simulations may be relevant for continuum modeling of cleavage fracture [98], ductileto-brittle assessment [93], fatigue crack closure [99] and ductile damage [94,95,100]. Furthermore, accounting for the influence of GNDs in the vicinity of the crack may be particularly relevant in the modelization of hydrogen assisted cracking, due to the essential role that the hydrostatic stress has on both interface decohesion and hydrogen diffusion in relation to the fracture process zone (see [36]).…”
Section: Rσ Y Jmentioning
confidence: 99%