1990
DOI: 10.1109/33.56169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the off-contact screen printing process. I. Model of the printing process and some results derived from experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the light of these objections, Owczarek and Howland [10,11] instead adopted a modelling approach based upon lubrication theory, more recently extended by Anderson et al [12] to consider the printing of power-law fluids. None of these models, however, has taken into proper consideration the real geometry of the screen-printing process.…”
Section: Description Of the Industrial Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the light of these objections, Owczarek and Howland [10,11] instead adopted a modelling approach based upon lubrication theory, more recently extended by Anderson et al [12] to consider the printing of power-law fluids. None of these models, however, has taken into proper consideration the real geometry of the screen-printing process.…”
Section: Description Of the Industrial Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his theory, the ink roll in front of the squeegee is treated as a pump generating high hydrostatic pressure close to the squeegee edge to inject ink into the screen meshes. Owczarek and Howland [7,8] described a physical model of the screen printing process. They found that the angles of squeegees during printing decrease from the unformed angle of 45 degrees by about 20 degrees for hard squeegees (90 shore A) and by 30 -40 degrees for soft squeegees (60 shore A).…”
Section: Review Of Screen Printing Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies of the process have made little advancement in the development of reliable screen printing process models. Early models showed some predicted trends which were in agreement with experimental observation but even the most recent developments require significant oversimplification (e.g., material viscoelasticity is ignored) which limit practical use [6,7]. Establishing process/material characteristics and their impact on printed performance therefore is reliant on experimental studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%