1953
DOI: 10.1021/ja01109a026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of the Influence of a Number of Factors upon the Stability and upon the Activity of Pancreatic Amylase1

Abstract: The stability and the activity of pancreatic amylase are exceedingly sensitive to its chemical environment. This paper reports additional observations concerning some of the factors concerned. The work was carried out with three times crystallized electrophoretically homogeneous amylase. The factors studied include: the influence of the pH of its aqueous solutions upon the stability of the amylase at different temperatures; the influence of the concentration of the amylase upon its stability in aqueous solutio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1957
1957
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Phytic acid should also be structurally capable of binding with starch through phosphate links (Badenhuizen, ) and should directly reduce starch digestion (Thompson et al., ). Moreover, as Ca is required for amylase activity (Caldwell and Kung, ), its complexation by phytate may lead to reduced enzyme activity. In reverse, Ca addition may react with phytic acid, making it less available for amylase binding (Thompson et al., ).…”
Section: Phytatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytic acid should also be structurally capable of binding with starch through phosphate links (Badenhuizen, ) and should directly reduce starch digestion (Thompson et al., ). Moreover, as Ca is required for amylase activity (Caldwell and Kung, ), its complexation by phytate may lead to reduced enzyme activity. In reverse, Ca addition may react with phytic acid, making it less available for amylase binding (Thompson et al., ).…”
Section: Phytatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytic acid also appears capable of inhibiting starch hydrolysis in the small intestine (Plaami, 1997), a consequence of this is that a greater proportion of starch is made available for gut bacterial fermentation with the production of SCFA to lower colonic pH and thus precipitates potential carcinogens such as secondary bile acids and ammonia (Cummings, 1995). Phytic acid is thought to inhibit starch hydrolysis by either binding directly to the starch through phosphate links (Caldwell & King, 1953) or reducing the efficiency of the enzyme salivary amylase by binding Ca 2+ (which is essential for the functioning of the enzyme) or by binding directly to enzyme itself (Thompson et al ., 1987). Lastly, phytic acid can also compete for binding sites of insulin‐like growth factor II (IGF II), these sites are over expressed in gastrointestinal cancer cell lines and are important for increasing cellular proliferation in tumours (Sullivan et al ., 1995; Lamonerie et al ., 1995).…”
Section: Phytic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%