2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aqrep.2018.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of the digestive enzyme activities in scaleless carp (Gymnocypris przewalskii) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Protease activity along the intestine did not differ between the anterior and posterior intestines, which indicated the presence of protein hydrolysis activity along the digestive tract of the Javaen barb. The results of this study were not different from previous studies on Glyptosternum maculatum, Lota lota, and Gymnocypris przewalskii, which showed similarities in protease activity between the anterior and posterior intestine (Xiong et al, 2011;Izvekova et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2019). In contrast, Sparindentex hasta, Labeo rohita, and Hoplias malabaricus showed decreased protease activity in the posterior intestine (Jahantigh, 2015; Umalatha et al, 2016;Gioda et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Protease activity along the intestine did not differ between the anterior and posterior intestines, which indicated the presence of protein hydrolysis activity along the digestive tract of the Javaen barb. The results of this study were not different from previous studies on Glyptosternum maculatum, Lota lota, and Gymnocypris przewalskii, which showed similarities in protease activity between the anterior and posterior intestine (Xiong et al, 2011;Izvekova et al, 2013;Tian et al, 2019). In contrast, Sparindentex hasta, Labeo rohita, and Hoplias malabaricus showed decreased protease activity in the posterior intestine (Jahantigh, 2015; Umalatha et al, 2016;Gioda et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…However, the protease activity shown in this study may differ from the activity of specific proteases such as trypsin and chymotrypsin. Previous studies have demonstrated in various species, such as Gymnocypris przewalskii, Mycrophis brachyurus, and Mystus nemurus which found the activity of trypsin and chymotrypsin in the intestine with optimal pH ranging from 9 to 10 ( Tian et al, 2019;Martinez-Cardenas et al, 2020;Rahmah et al, 2020). It appears that trypsin and chymotrypsin have optimal activity with a narrower pH range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of trypsin and chymotrypsin activities in fish is rather variable. For example, in scaleless carp (Gymnocypris przewalskii) the activity of trypsin is much higher than that of chymotrypsin (Tian et al, 2019), while in the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) chymotrypsin activity contributes more to digestion than trypsin activity (de la Parra et al, 2007). Even so, our observations in general agree with the notion that fish with carnivorous preferences show high proteolytic enzyme activities to digest high-protein animals, while herbivorous species exhibit higher carbohydrase activities to digest the storage carbohydrates of macroalgae (German et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important step for optimal nutritional values and cost-effectiveness (Barlaya et al 2016). The utilization of nutrients in fish depends on the activities of digestive enzymes with different properties in the digestive organs (Tian et al 2019). The activity of digestive enzymes in fish may be changed depending on the fish age, feeding type, season, temperature (Munilla-Moran and Saborido-Rey, 1996), fish size (Murtaza et al 2016), feeding habits (Almeida et al 2018), time of day, infestation with parasites (Solovyev et al 2015) and intestinal morphology (Barlaya et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%