2017
DOI: 10.14687/jhs.v14i3.4673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A study of STEM Awareness Scale development for high school teachers<p>Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerine yönelik FeTeMM Farkındalık Ölçeği (FFÖ) geliştirme çalışması

Abstract: The aim of this study is to develop a scale in order to identify science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) awareness levels of teachers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics fields (mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology and information technology) in high schools. The research was conducted with 247 teachers working in high schools. 24 items were selected from the question pool created during the first phase of the study in line with expert opinions. Exploratory factor analysis (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, it was concluded that the STEM attitudes and achievements of female students were higher than those of male students (Karakaya & Avgın, 2016;Knezek, Christensen & Tylor-Wood, 2011). There are also results showing that there is no significant difference between teachers or pre-service teachers' STEM awareness and STEM attitudes based on the gender variable (Aydın, Saka, & Guzey, 2017;Bakırcı & Karışan, 2018;Çevik, 2017;Hacıömeroğlu, 2017;Simon, Wagner, & Killion, 2017). These results supported the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Additionally, it was concluded that the STEM attitudes and achievements of female students were higher than those of male students (Karakaya & Avgın, 2016;Knezek, Christensen & Tylor-Wood, 2011). There are also results showing that there is no significant difference between teachers or pre-service teachers' STEM awareness and STEM attitudes based on the gender variable (Aydın, Saka, & Guzey, 2017;Bakırcı & Karışan, 2018;Çevik, 2017;Hacıömeroğlu, 2017;Simon, Wagner, & Killion, 2017). These results supported the results of this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The factors that were identified by receiving expert opinions are the teacher (Factor 1), planning and implementation (Factor 2), and student (Factor 3). Noteworthily, a similar scale development study in the literature found the following factor names: STEM's effect on the student, STEM's effect on the lesson, and STEM's effect on the teacher (Cevik, 2017). For example, the "I have sufficient knowledge about STEM education."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition, the increase in scale development and adaptation studies in the literature related to STEM and science teachers draws attention (Corlu et al, 2014;Derin, Aydin & Kirkic, 2017;Hacıomeroglu & Bulut, 2016;Unlu, Dokme, & Veli, 2016). When examining these studies, they are seen to mostly focus on affective factors such as attitudes (Derin, Aydin & Kirkic, 2017), motivation (Donmez, 2020), and awareness (Buyruk & Korkmaz, 2016;Cevik, 2017). No scale study was found regarding obtaining teachers' opinions toward STEM clubs or the work carried out by these clubs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…STEM eğitiminin doğru uygulanabilmesi ve eğitim sistemimiz ile uyumluluğunun sağlanabilmesi için öğretmenlerin görüşleri de önem arz etmektedir. STEM alanlarında geliştirilen ölçekler incelendiğinde ise, ortaokul öğrencilerine ve öğretmen adaylarına yönelik olduğu görülmektedir (Çorlu, Capraro ve Çorlu, 2015;Koyunlu Ünlü, Dökme ve Ünlü 2016;Çevik, 2017). Ayrıca Çevik (2017)'in STEM alan öğretmenlerinin farkındalıklarını ölçmeye yönelik geliştirdiği ölçek alan yazına katkı sağlamaktadır.…”
Section: Sonuç Ve Tartışmaunclassified